Subject: Let's see...
Author:
Posted on: 2011-07-10 19:58:00 UTC

Torture is out. Full stop.

If it qualifies as torture, even if you squint, you probably shouldn't use it in a mission. That is to say, so long as it's a clean kill, it's not overkill in my opinion, at least.

For example, let's put it this way. Say you decide to kill a Sue with fire. There're two ways you can go about this.

1) Setting her on fire, or;

2) Carefully burning her bit by bit and keeping her alive and awake through it until she's entirely burnt up.

It boils down to the same thing, (Sue Flambé, anyone?) but the execution is entirely different. With the second, you're willingly and consciously prolonging the pain and misery caused, and forcing the Sue to be conscious and aware of what's going on.

The first is a painful death too, yeah, but you aren't making the conscious choice to make it more painful or terrible than it is by default.

That said, I don't think there's anything wrong with scaring the crap out of the Sue before you actually get to the causing of bodily harm portion. (Like, say, waking the Sue up in the dreaded Room 101 and telling her.)

Reply Return to messages