Subject: Yeah, probably.
Author:
Posted on: 2011-04-05 14:07:00 UTC

Yeah, it's badfic. But I wouldn't spork it. GET READY FOR A LONG DISCUSSION-PROMPTING RANT. PUT ON YOUR RANT HELMETS.

I'd like to delicately point out that the 'grossness' of a fanfic does not necessarily indicate it's worthiness to be sporked. Just because it grosses you out doesn't mean that's the reason why it should be sporked.

I recognize a lot of these nasty things as fetish material, publicly displayed or not. After reading a bit of the fic, I see that the writer was VERY aware of what he/she was writing and none of it was a mistake or an ignorance of biology-- more like a kink for twisted or different biology.

The best 'gross' bad slash for missions is fun to make fun of. Say, a story describes somebody not knowing people have intestines, or is made from an utter ignorance of how the act is done at all. This makes hilarious images of Ikea Erotica or silly physically-impossible stunts.

TL;DR-- don't look for 'gross.' Look for 'bad' -- the ones that say that an Arwing looks like a croissant, or ones that describe Fox's eyes as 'thunderclouding orbs.'

A normal, or even beige and lame sex scene with a guy who shoots lightning from cue-balls where his eyeballs should be is way funnier to write about than a canon character growing the other set of funtools.

Reply Return to messages