Subject: Re: on batman
Author:
Posted on: 2010-04-26 18:16:00 UTC

I'd have to disagree (about the Batman caring, not the Scarecrow being awesome), although I think it varies from writer to writer.

If Batman does not care what happens to those he captures, then why would he bother capturing them in the first place? Why wouldn't he just become the DC's version of the Punisher and off all of his foes? After all, his ultimate end goal is to ensure that what happened to him (his parents' deaths) does not happen to anyone else. It would be so much easier to do that if all the criminals are dead. Why bother being bound by a moral code if it stands in the way of your ultimate goal? He has the moral code because he cares, because he must care. Otherwise he's no better than the criminals he fights.

Besides, there are quite a few stories where Batman is shown to be sympathetic towards his rogues (again, varying from writer to writer and medium to medium). The BTAS episode 'Heart of Ice,' for example, has Batman react with horror to the apparent fate of Dr. Freeze's wife and later express his sympathy to the villain in person. One could argue that Batman exaggerated those emotions to try and manipulate Freeze, but I would disagree.

Reply Return to messages