Subject: Oh, definitely.
Author:
Posted on: 2010-02-09 16:10:00 UTC
I think I meant more egregious flaws than that... but I've lost my train of thought. My apologies. ^^;
Subject: Oh, definitely.
Author:
Posted on: 2010-02-09 16:10:00 UTC
I think I meant more egregious flaws than that... but I've lost my train of thought. My apologies. ^^;
Maybe instead of sporking you can try and give them constructive criticism? A bit of 'you did this well, but this needs work'?
And if concrit doesn't work, SPORK THEIR BRAINS OUT, YO! That's my usual strategy. If they reply to constructive criticism with OMG UR SO MEEEN! whining, you can feel completely without guilt in writing a merciless parody.
There are, of course, the ones who will run with con-crit, and genuinely make the effort to improve, and the ones who will do as Maudlin Hart says. And then there's my least favorite, the ones who take the criticism, pick it apart, and then give you back all the reasons it's not valid while completely ignoring the fact that they could be less than perfect.
What does one do with those, I wonder? A sporking, as well? It is a rather Suethor-ish thing to do, but some of them actually do have work that's not bad, just... could be better.
I always had the impression that we don't go after "not bad, just... could be better", but "so bad it's horrible" fic. It's definitely more fun and easier to spork a fic with a horrible blatant Sue, OOC characters, and bad spelling than it is to spork one with a slightly Sueish char and some typos.
I think I meant more egregious flaws than that... but I've lost my train of thought. My apologies. ^^;