Subject: Now that you mention it
Author:
Posted on: 2010-01-23 23:35:00 UTC
It is tempting... They'd have to be stripped of their 'Sue powers first, but I can see how death by CAF would be entertaining. -grins-
--anamia
-
Badfic author, Anime badfics by
on 2010-01-23 22:43:00 UTC
Reply
Piph came across an author in the Pit called Black Alice Butterfly.
She desribes herself in a way that makes most sane (or not so sane) people think of an Emo!Sue, has an unbelievably long profile and has currently written 20 fics riddled with spelling mistakes, horrible describtion and random OOCness. These fics include, but are not limited to:
A D.Gray-Man/Harry Potter crossover, called: "the hogwarts dilemma", 5 chapters, horrible dialogue, OOCness, OCs, and a "silvered eyed gold-platinum blonde haired girl".
A Yu Yu Hakusho/Harry Potter crossover, called: "And It's off to hogwarts we go!" and claimed by Piph.
Several D.Gray-Man fanfictions with OOCness, OCs and sospelling/grammar mistakes it's painful.
Link to the author profile: http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1860946/BlackAliceButterfly
Can someone please deal with these fics? I will put the worst up on the Unclaimed Badfice page soon. -
Gah... just... gah! (nm) by
on 2010-01-28 16:09:00 UTC
Reply
-
Unclaimed Badfics by
on 2010-01-25 15:31:00 UTC
Reply
Some of the fanfictions are on the Unclaimed Badfic page on the Wiki. The D.Gray-Man ones will follow as soon as I have refamiliarized myself with the continuum and know how bad it is.
-
Frag, that's a long profile. by
on 2010-01-24 00:09:00 UTC
Reply
But she's probably a troll.
-
Gods by
on 2010-01-23 23:17:00 UTC
Reply
Anyone notice anything wrong with this sentence? "She had back length blonde hair that was pulled to the side and tied with a black ribbon over her right shoulder, her raven locks framing her pale face." Fun image, that.
That was the 5th sentence of one of them. And she is almost certainly an author self-insert. The fact that they have the same name is worrisome.
On the other hand, I did find this on her profile, which might be useful when charging 'Sues. "62)I am allowed to have a toad, rat, cat, or owl. I am not allowed to have a reticulated python, snow leopard, Tasmanian devil, or pirahna."
All things considered, I don't think I'll waste my time reading past sentence 5. I'd rather not build up a tolerance to drivel. It might lower my standards, and that would be bad for sporking.
--anamia -
Hmm by
on 2010-01-23 23:21:00 UTC
Reply
Maybe if we let them have those animals they would end up getting eaten by their pets?
I'm just enjoying the image of the Tasmanian Devil Looney Toons character eating a Mary Sue. Then slobbering glitter.
Heh. -
Now that you mention it by
on 2010-01-23 23:35:00 UTC
Reply
It is tempting... They'd have to be stripped of their 'Sue powers first, but I can see how death by CAF would be entertaining. -grins-
--anamia -
Especially given how many of them have tigers or something by
on 2010-01-24 00:20:00 UTC
Reply
That's an om-nom-nom just waiting to happen.
-
I feel like RAGE. by
on 2010-01-23 22:49:00 UTC
Reply
Ugh. It's worse than I expected...
In every way imaginable! UGH! Everything about it is just wrong and horrible all at once!
...Which to me means nothing. I'm terrible like that. -
What, you? Rage? Since when? You're normally so mild & meek! (nm by
on 2010-01-24 02:25:00 UTC
Reply