Subject: Um. No.
Author:
Posted on: 2014-08-06 16:42:00 UTC

I'll go through this in order, picking out both good and bad points.

First of all, if you're not expecting to get Permission... why are you asking? You don't have to ask, no-one's trying to rush you into it. This is like taking a driving test without expecting to pass - you waste your own time, and the examiner's (though at least with this there's no money involved). If you want concrit, just ask for concrit - we have lots of people willing to give that. What you've done instead is demand that one of the very few Permission Givers look at something you don't actually think needs a PG's attention. I have no idea why you did this.

But that's all by the by. Let's look at your post.

The premise: I had an instinctive 'dear merciful Valar no' response to this, but on rereading, okay. Portalling characters from fanart into a RR to make them realistic - it's unorthodox, but I guess it would work. Sure.

The characters: the profiles are boring, but I think all profiles are boring. I really, honestly, truly don't care which weapons they use, and why people always think that's important baffles me. I also don't know why a 25-year-old would have white hair, or what a 20-year-old is doing being a trained soldier. But aside from that... you've got the loner, 'stubbon hyperactivity' (???), and the analytical 'nerd'. You make a comment that suggests you're going for Id/Ego/Superego, which could be interesting, though I don't know the psychological background well enough to pin each one down.

Sample 1: It... uh. No. In no particular order:

-Speech followed by a dialogue tag ends in a comma, not a full stop. "Like this," said Huinesoron.
-End quote marks should be followed by a space.
-Portals don't work like that. They can't suck things through, just allow them access. Send someone in to drag the soldiers out, sure. But drag the 'universe' the portal links to into HQ? Absolutely not.
-Narrator commentary in a third-person story is usually seen as bad form. 'Why... you ask?' is not something you'll see in a novel unless it's done continuously for effect (eg, The Hobbit, a bunch of other children's books).
-'The head technician' appears to be an unnamed Makes-Things; I don't know why you didn't just use his name.
-The Marquis de Sod doesn't get to order DoSAT to do things; he can ask, but not order.
-For that matter, why is the Marquis involved at all? They only want Assassins, so it seems like the SO would be the one to ask.
-I don't know why you claim people from fanart would be 'mindless', or even need culture implants; it seems like, if they have any existence at all, they should come with 'default backgrounds'.
-I'm pretty sure culture implants don't work like that anyway, though you'd have to ask Neshomeh.
-I have no idea what's up with the 'concentrated canon energy'; I don't think that's a thing.
-If they've been implanted with enough information to give them accents, that pretty much requires them to have false memories.
-The 'wait, this is the first thing that's happened to me' line is funny, I admit.
-The character aspects you claim for the characters... doesn't come through at all. I think you tried to do this - the Chinese one's first words are analysis of the situation - but it really didn't happen. They're totally interchangeable.
-How did they know the Marquis was a Flower?
-You claim they were given basic knowledge of the PPC, then have the Marquis explain it to them... make your mind up.
-Flowers talk in italics. If you don't know how to use italics, use /slashes/ or even *asterisks*. Not speech marks. Never speech marks.
-You have multiple people speaking in the same paragraph on multiple occasions.
-You need more capital letters on titles. 'Protectors of the Plot Continuum'. 'Twilight'. Etc.
-The Marquis' plan is... stupid. First of all, the DMS is not 'running out of agents'; that makes no sense. Secondly... how exactly is recruiting a whole three people going to fix that?
-Where do those names come from? The Marquis gives Grigori his name, and the others randomly pick their own? That's a whole story in itself, but you just... ignored it.
-That's a very long RC number.

And for completeness: the second sample.

-Did Sergio Turbo say you could use his agent?
-This is... a massive paragraph of unfamiliar acronyms. It suffers from all the problems of the previous sample, particularly not breaking for new speakers.
-And, again, it doesn't show us the characterisation at all. Zhao - the analytical 'nerd' - enters the scene yelling angrily. Anderson, the stubborn one, agrees to compromise. You're telling me one thing and showing me another. Zhao is a ball of fury compared to easygoing Grigori - which isn't who I was told to expect!

And overall comments:

-We strongly suggest in the discussion of Permission that you should get a beta reader. If you had a beta reader for these stories, sack them and get a different one who knows what punctuation should look like.
-Your agents devolve into talking heads. The only things they move are their mouths and their physical locations. In the final paragraph, Grigori says 'Calm down,' and then directs a comment to Zhao. He doesn't make any gestures, or turn, or alter his facial expression at all - from what you've told me, he just stands there staring at the wall making comments in monotone. And that goes for every character, all the way through.
-There's nothing really interesting in either of your stories. You have three characters who were created with no memories - and don't give us any of their reactions to this fact. You have an argument over guns, which doesn't devolve into exciting (threats of) violence or... anything. It's just people, saying words, and then someone else says some.
-You don't have to know how to use HTML to copy and paste a link into a post. It's really simple.
-Sentences start with capital letters. You've been dropping them since your very first post; can you please get a handle on this?

So: Permission Denied. Your idea for their origin is interesting and I think unique, but your writing skills, both technical and in terms of characterisation and making things interesting to read, have not shown themselves to be up to making it readable.

I'm sorry.

hS

Reply Return to messages