Subject: From the top, then...
Author:
Posted on: 2014-07-13 05:29:00 UTC

I really couldn't get into your writing sample at all. It feels like it's going through the motions without any interest or emotion, a marionette show rather than a story. It's relatively sound from a technical perspective, but there's far more to writing than crossing all your 'T's and dotting all your 'I's.

I have no sense of who your characters are, what makes them tick, or what they like or dislike. I don't even have any sense that the organization in the recruitment story is the PPC - beyond the explanation that Agent Lowe gives, it feels nothing like the PPC. An interrogation room? A human in a suit? The line about Fisher being "made to be a cafeteria worker"? This is not what the PPC feels like.

Secondly, your behavior has been uninspiring. You rushed into your first permission request - which, in all fairness, happens a lot - but even your reply there showed no indication that you recognized what had gone wrong. I quote: "I suppose that it is professional to send a standard rejection notice when a manuscript has been chewed up by the post office" - a third-person-passive response that accepts no responsibility.

This permission request seems to have the exact same problem - rather than take the time to put together an organized request, you just dumped a link to a gdocs folder. This shows an active lack of respect for the PGs and process, and I would like to take this excellent opportunity to remind you that the PGs are both doing this in their spare time and are some of the more respected members of the community. Demonstrating that you don't respect people that the community tends to respect really doesn't do much to argue in your favor. (For that matter, your inability to get along with Neshomeh, who is one of the nicer PGs, is a significant point against you.)

And then there's this thread. You made a mistake, certainly - just about everyone has. However, you then doubled down and tried to defend what you had said, rather than admit that you had made a mistake.

On those two considerations, I'm going to have to deny permission.

Finally, there is this thread and its fallout. Your exchanges with Neshomeh, VM, and Ekyl were irrational, bordering on incoherent, and completely out of line with what is expected of you on this forum. Furthermore, you have demonstrated no willingness to accept any responsibility for what happened. Your first "apology" message is nothing more than a list of excuses - it contains neither acknowledgement that you were out of line nor a single mention of the people you attacked. (For comparison's sake, you mentioned yourself in it no less than sixteen times.) Your behavior in the last two days would, on its own, be grounds for denial of permission.

Reply Return to messages