Subject: Re: Deep-entrenched fanon
Author:
Posted on: 2014-05-28 08:46:00 UTC

Not at all familiar with the game, so I don't really understand the reference. Can you explain the effect that description has?

Fanon is kind of a grey area I think. Others might have a different take on it, but that's mine.

A popular fanon in the Marvel cinematic verse fanfics is that Phil Coulson and Clint Barton are in a relationship (or begin one, or any of the other shipping variations of stories). I really think they are never on-screen with each other. Coulson mentions Clint's name once during a phone conversation. It's not from historical comic sources, Coulson didn't exist in the comics until after he got popular in the movies. I haven't watched 100% of the Spiderman cartoons where he's a character, but I don't remember seeing Clint in them.

The only interaction I've actually seen between the two of them in canon (admittedly I am horribly behind on the Marvel Now series) is Coulson infecting Clint with mind controlling nano bots and setting him up to be tortured by bad guys and then killed by Nick Fury. The bullet Fury shot him with had repairing nano bots in it, so they fixed all the damage from the torture, then the ones Coulson infected him with erased the whole series of events from his mind.

Anyway, point is that there is this huge body of fanon that says they destined for one another. It is completely unsupported by the canon, in any form of the canon that I know of. A lot of the fanon is well-written (and vastly preferred reading over the Fury and Coulson in the comics that I want to kill slowly (in narrative form of course) based on that incident I talked about). Does that make fics based on that fanon charge worthy?

I don't think it does, but someone else might get very infested in that comic series and really hate that Coulson's character is derailed into someone who wouldn't do that to another human being, and be all for killing the story.

Reply Return to messages