We should absolutely do this more often.

Subject: We should absolutely do this more often.
Author: KittyNoodles
Posted on: 2013-03-18 01:17:00 UTC

Except next time, I call Edgeworth.

Also I want to roleplay as him next time. :D

Jump to this post's position in the thread ↴

I b'lieve I've discovered a new Sue color... by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 20:36:00 UTC Reply

It doesn't have a Sue-y name yet, but it's described as 'more greener'.

The defense holds that this color is a disgustingly dark green that turns bright lime-green in direct sunlight. When used in clothing, both colors are present in the same fabric, kind of like Sue-colored velvet.

Thoughts?

(Oops, and the fic I found this in is right here. Seventh paragraph down - or third big paragraph.)

Expand this post →

Re: I b'lieve I've discovered a new Sue color... by Pauline07 on 2013-03-18 16:18:00 UTC Reply

Sounds.....interesting (or revolting). I'd love to see the fabric if this would actually happen (or throw the offending piece of fabric into the fire pit)

Oh, trust me, you'll see it. by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-19 04:00:00 UTC Reply

It's one of the official colors of OFUA, so of course there will be meen and glite jerseys and sweaters available for students to purchase before the year is out.

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:32:00 UTC Reply

The defense demands that the prosecution tell the court what it's talking about!

It's very simple, Mr. Wright. by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 23:34:00 UTC Reply

It's been my goal all along to have the defendant, 'Meen', declared a Suvian color. You just did my work for me!

Thank you kindly, Mr. Wright. I didn't even have to work for my 'Guilty' verdict.

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:49:00 UTC Reply

The defense has held from the beginning that this color is Suvian! The true case at hand...

Is whether or not this color exists as a separate Suvian color from the others we already know of!

We've been arguing the same thing from the beginning, Wright by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 23:53:00 UTC Reply

That's why I rested my case....

Because you'd already proven Meen's guilt!

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:58:00 UTC Reply

I've been arguing that Meen is a new color.

You were the one arguing something entirely different! Whether or not Meen is Suvian is not the case at hand!

What we are really here to decide...

...Is whether or not it is a new color that deserves to be added to the list of known Suvian colors!

Expand this post →

Of course. by The Prosecution on 2013-03-18 00:03:00 UTC Reply

If it i a new color, and Suvian...

It should obviously be on the list.

Wh-WHAAAAAAAAAAAT?! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:04:00 UTC Reply

THEN HOW DID I GET A GUILTY VERIDCT?!

Ha Ha Ha Ha by The Prosecution on 2013-03-18 00:07:00 UTC Reply

If it's new...and Suvian...

How could it possibly be anything but guilty? Have you forgotten where we are, Mr. Wright?

Expand this post →

Oh, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:13:00 UTC Reply

Th-that's impossible! Then... then this was all for nothing?!

I'm sorry, Mia... I just couldn't win this time...

??? by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:23:00 UTC Reply

The defense isn't done yet, Your Honor! If what Mr. Edgeworth says is true, then we should not have gotten a guilty verdict! In fact, if what he says is true, then the prosecution has failed to do its job by disproving the idea that this color is a new Suvian color!

Expand this post →

....... by Riese on 2013-03-18 00:36:00 UTC Reply

I-I didn't squee! S-stop lying!

Riese: by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:13:00 UTC Reply

Putting the 'tsun' and 'tsundere' since whenever the heck.

I do not! B-baka! (nm) by Riese on 2013-03-18 19:41:00 UTC Reply

Yuh-huh. by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-19 13:22:00 UTC Reply

M-Mia?! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:28:00 UTC Reply

(She's right! If I've been trying all along to prove this is a new color...)

(...Then a guilty verdict would mean I had failed to do so!)

Your Honor! The defense demands that you reassess your verdict in this case!

Expand this post →

How do you even keep posting all of these .gifs? by Outhra on 2013-03-18 00:55:00 UTC Reply

Here I am, not even knowing how the hyperlink function works here, and here are two people skilled enough at bending the Board to their will to have lengthy Phoenix Wright references in the form of dueling animated images. Bravo.

I would post an applause .gif, but as implied by the title of this post, I have no clue how I would go about doing it.

Check here for cheats. by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:02:00 UTC Reply

http://yourwebapps.com/WebApps/db-view.cgi?db=83303&sort=1&

Lots of help here.

So... by Khaosity on 2013-03-18 02:55:00 UTC Reply

this should be red this should be blue this should be purple *has new toy* It's about 3 am here and I have to work tomorrow (not until 2 pm, thank goodness), but, well... as I said, new toy!

Oi! -baps- by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-19 04:02:00 UTC Reply

There are many HTML codes for this Board, Khaosity, and none of them should be used lightly!
Today. I have to work LATER TODAY. I can't brain... (nm) by Khaosity on 2013-03-18 03:17:00 UTC Reply

OBJECTION by The Prosecution on 2013-03-18 00:34:00 UTC Reply

T-this is an outrage!

Objection overruled. by Judge on 2013-03-18 00:35:00 UTC Reply

Mr. Wright, I am intrigued. You may continue.

This is your chance, Phoenix! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:38:00 UTC Reply

Time to turn this case on its head!

Right, Chief! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:43:00 UTC Reply

Your Honor, the defense agrees that Suvian colors are all, by default, guilty. That goes without question.

However!

The point of this case was never to argue that to begin with! The only reason we're here is to determine whether or not Meen is in fact a new color!

Since the defense holds that it IS a new Suvian color...

...A 'guilty' verdict should only be handed down if the defense fails to prove as much to the court!

Expand this post →

! by Judge on 2013-03-18 00:46:00 UTC Reply

Ah. Well then. If the defense would restate its case, I believe we can bring this to a close.

Gladly, Your Honor! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:56:00 UTC Reply

The defense holds that the defendant, Meen, is a new Suvian color. Therefore, the defense seeks to disprove the prosecution's claim that it is not a new color and should not be added to the list.

In other words, Your Honor, a guilty verdict in this trial would mean that the court has decided Meen is NOT a new Suvian color!

Expand this post →

Hmmm. by Judge on 2013-03-18 01:01:00 UTC Reply

All right, then. In light of this, I hereby declare the defendant

((EPILOGUE)) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:12:00 UTC Reply

Great job in there, Phoenix! I knew you could do it!

Th-thanks, Mia...

Bonus Scene:

Expand this post →

That was fun! :D (nm) by Riese on 2013-03-18 01:14:00 UTC Reply

We should absolutely do this more often. by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:17:00 UTC Reply

Except next time, I call Edgeworth.

Also I want to roleplay as him next time. :D

Suuuuure. And the next time, I get Manfred von Karma. (nm) by Riese on 2013-03-18 01:19:00 UTC Reply

IT'S A (court) DATE, THEN. (nm) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:21:00 UTC Reply

Well played! (nm) by Riese on 2013-03-18 01:25:00 UTC Reply

Thank you, I thought it was. -brushes shoulders off- (nm) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:37:00 UTC Reply

'More greener' by Quantum on 2013-03-17 22:27:00 UTC Reply

Based on your description, I suspect it is the waste product of some suvian abomination. That, or it is one of my cooking experiments has gone awry, again.

Nope and nope. by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:43:00 UTC Reply

It's used to describe the difference between one landscape and another.

Dang, I'm good. by Ellipsis Flood on 2013-03-17 22:49:00 UTC Reply

I had just mentioned my ISP's old slogan "Doesn't get any greener." (Translated from German)

I thus suggest this as meen's appearance in a reality room:

UPDATE: I'm dubbing this color 'meen'. (nm) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 20:52:00 UTC Reply
Tsk tsk. by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 20:40:00 UTC Reply

A brilliant theory, truly.

http://www.court-records.net/animation/edgeworth-smirk(a).gif

BUT.

http://www.court-records.net/animation/edgeworth-document(b).gif

The record clearly shows that it is NOT the seventh paragraph down! It's the eighth!

http://www.court-records.net/animation/edgeworth-handondesk(b).gif

Explain yourself!

Expand this post →

Ack! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 20:46:00 UTC Reply

No waaaaaaaaaay!

Uhm, uh, well that's just a minor detail...

Not so fast! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 20:53:00 UTC Reply

This "minor detail" has great bearing on the reader's ability to understand what you're saying!

You can't possibly call that minor!

Er, well, you see... by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 20:59:00 UTC Reply

Uhm, that's not exactly what I meant...

Ahem! by Judge on 2013-03-17 21:01:00 UTC Reply

The defense will be more careful in the future!

Y-yes, Your Honor... by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 21:02:00 UTC Reply

Very well, then. by Judge on 2013-03-17 21:08:00 UTC Reply

The defense may proceed.

OBJECTION! (Disregard other, broken link) by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 21:24:00 UTC Reply

There is no need, Your Honor, the defense has no case!
OBJECTION! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 21:13:00 UTC Reply

Your Honor, there is no need. The defense has no case.

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 21:23:00 UTC Reply

The defense still holds that this new color - 'more greener' - is found within the chapter provided and is a disgustingly dark green until it comes into contact with direct sunlight, at which point it turns bright lime-green!

These facts...

...remain indisputable!

Expand this post →

The defense's logic has a certain legitimacy to it... by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 21:30:00 UTC Reply

However!

If you've mixed up such a minor detail so badly, why should we believe you haven't made more mistakes in your case?!

Expand this post →

Aha, but Mr. Edgeworth... by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 21:40:00 UTC Reply

You yourself have not been flawless with your case!

Just now, you claimed to have had a broken link in one of your posts. However...

The defense could not spot any such links anywhere in the post you were referring to!

How can this court be so certain you are to be trusted when you overlook something so blatantly obvious?!

Expand this post →

Urk..! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 21:44:00 UTC Reply

T-that's irrelevant! It has no bearing on this case!

And my point stands, Wright!

Expand this post →

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 21:50:00 UTC Reply

If you want to go that route...

Then can you really say the defense's poor choice of words has any bearing on this case?!

Expand this post →

I can and I will. by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 21:56:00 UTC Reply

The fact that I accidentally included a broken link in no way misled the members of this court as to the nature of the case.

Yours, on the other hand, obviously did!

Expand this post →

And on a further note! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:05:00 UTC Reply

I didn't say it was your inclusion of a broken link! I was referring to the fact...

...that the link in question is not broken at all!
The fact that I used the word 'minor' didn't mislead anyone! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:02:00 UTC Reply

I'm not the one who's being misleading here, Wright! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 22:07:00 UTC Reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdIlP488n14

The fact remains that you cited entirely the wrong paragraph! There's no way to talk your way out of this - I've got you cornered!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdIlP488n14

Expand this post →

Urk! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:13:00 UTC Reply

That may be true, however...

How is this still a point of contention if this matter of which paragraph this color shows up in has already been cleared up?

Expand this post →

Tsk tsk! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 22:18:00 UTC Reply

I see you've managed to miss the point entirely.

This was never a question of whether you'd cleared up the matter - it was a question of your reliability! If you can't even get the paragraph right, what else have you gotten wrong?!

Expand this post →

R-right back at you! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:23:00 UTC Reply

If you're willing to try and hide the fact that the image you presented was simply not the one you wanted to use by calling it a broken link...

...What else are you hiding from the court?!

Expand this post →

OBJECTION! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 22:28:00 UTC Reply

Your Honor, I request the defense refrain from ad hominem attacks.

((Darn you, Riese...)) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:40:00 UTC Reply

((You know I can't think straight when I'm staring at a smiling Edgeworth.))
Well, Mr. Wright? What do you have to say for yourself? by Judge on 2013-03-17 22:29:00 UTC Reply

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:38:00 UTC Reply

The defense was only following the prosecution's own tactic by bringing up something already said in this trial and using it against the prosecution!

In other words...

Ad hominem either never came into play in my argument, or the prosecution is equally guilty of it!

Expand this post →

GAH! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 22:49:00 UTC Reply

Y-you upstart....amateur...

Grr...M-my point still stands! I demand the defense give proof that it remains reliable!

Expand this post →

Order! I will have order! Enough of this! by Judge on 2013-03-17 22:53:00 UTC Reply

No, Your Honor! by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 22:55:00 UTC Reply

I will have an answer to this!

I-I've been overruled?! by Judge on 2013-03-17 22:55:00 UTC Reply

Oh, c'mon, Your Honor, don't let him do that...! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:03:00 UTC Reply

(Oh man, he's got the Judge under his thumb here! I'm really in trouble now!)

Tsk tsk. by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 23:08:00 UTC Reply

What's the matter, Wright? You don't know the answer?

Or could it be that...

http://s1161.beta.photobucket.com/user/YankeeFlyBoy/media/Reaction%20Folder/Edgeworth/Animation006zpsdbadc439.gif.html?sort=3&o=30

There isn't an answer? You're blowing smoke, Wright!

Expand this post →

OBJECTION! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:22:00 UTC Reply

The defense has all the evidence it needs that it remains reliable, and it's right here!

It's right here, in this post by a third party!

This post is undeniable proof that not only does this new Suvian color exist...

...BUT THAT IT ALSO POSSESSES THE ABILITY TO BECOME LIME-GREEN UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS!

Expand this post →

Ha ha ha ha by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 23:26:00 UTC Reply

You've played right into my trap, Wright!

Your Honor, the Prosecution rests.

Expand this post →

I see. by Judge on 2013-03-17 23:27:00 UTC Reply

Well then, given the evidence, I must declare the defendant, 'Meen'...

Expand this post →

Thank you, Your Honor. by The Prosecution on 2013-03-17 23:32:00 UTC Reply

N-no... by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:52:00 UTC Reply

This can't be the end...

Phoenix... by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 23:54:00 UTC Reply

...Don't give up yet, Phoenix...

OMG YOU CAN PUT GIFS ON THE BOARD (nm) by Karen on 2013-03-17 21:47:00 UTC Reply

YES, U CAN! by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-17 22:01:00 UTC Reply

THANK YOU MASTER (nm) by Karen on 2013-03-18 00:52:00 UTC Reply
How? by son_of_heaven176 on 2013-03-17 23:17:00 UTC Reply

i.e., what is the HTML code for embedding pics on the Board?

Re: How? by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 00:09:00 UTC Reply

Minus the spaces and quotation marks, of course.

Thanks by son_of_heaven176 on 2013-03-18 06:15:00 UTC Reply

-paws at the colorful picture~- (nm) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 07:01:00 UTC Reply

Oh, that's how you do it. by Outhra on 2013-03-18 01:02:00 UTC Reply

Well, now I'm a little embarrassed for not reading all the way to the bottom of the chain before replying.

Here is the applause .gif that I talked about earlier, members of the .gif courtroom.

You deserve it.

Expand this post →

I feel so special~ (nm) by KittyNoodles on 2013-03-18 01:38:00 UTC Reply