Subject: Let's go with "it depends"
Author:
Posted on: 2014-04-03 22:44:00 UTC

Depends on the character, that is. Depends on their abilities, their personalities, and their worlds.

I could buy Pinkie Pie being able to see the agents, but completely ignoring their presence because there's something shiny over there. The SEP field would, after all, make the agents very non-shiny, and even if Pinkie's attention ricochets all over the place and occasionally lands on the agents, they're just not interesting enough for her to notice them for long.

The SEP field makes the agents into irrelevant parts of the scenery. You could say it's a targeted induction of inattentional blindness.

The SEP field would be something that's most easily penetrated by someone who notices everything and considers nothing irrelevant. For example: A savant with a photographic memory, or a robot which records its surroundings in detail. But even these characters have to determine which things are relevant enough to be acted on, and which things are not. The SEP field puts the agents into the "not relevant enough to be acted on" category.

To actually be immune to an SEP field, a character would have to:
1. Process ALL the information coming in from their environment; nothing can be declared irrelevant (otherwise the agents are "irrelevant" and not noticed).
2. Be able to think quickly enough to process all the information in such detail (otherwise the character will only consciously notice the agents later on when it reviews the stored "footage".)
3. Be able to act quickly enough to act on all the information in their environment (otherwise the character has to choose which information is relevant enough to be acted on, and the SEP field helps them declare the agents as irrelevant.)

Reply Return to messages