Subject: Re: I don't follow your reasoning.
Author:
Posted on: 2014-03-27 03:53:00 UTC

I'll answer in brief. If you want to continue (or anyone else for that matter), feel free to send me an email.

First and foremost, for any post, it's usually possible that I could have been clearer. I'll just say this: I'm not saying that positive portrayals of homosexual romances will in and of themselves lead to the marginalization of those who disagree; what I am saying is that they are a step in that direction. Think about it: If homosexual couples are just as common as heterosexual couples (for that would be the portrayal), and if it is completely harmless (for so the media portrays it, and so the argument goes), then those who say that homosexuality is somehow "wrong" must have something wrong with them!

As for your analogy, it falls short. Here's why: In the case of cultural acceptance of homosexuality, it's not a matter of "I'll do what I want, and you do what you want; let's not bother each other," as is the case with drinking.
If I were to say, "I don't drink for religious reasons," no one would object.
Even if I said, "I don't think you should drink; it is a sin," you might say, "Don't try to tell me not to drink," but we could still be friends afterwards.
(I am only speaking hypothetically; I have no such religious qualms about drinking. Getting drunk, on the other hand...)
Only if I were being nasty and pushy about it would it be a ground for antagonism between me and my alcohol-enjoying friend—and rightly so.

However, when it comes to homosexuality, I believe that the way things are is more akin to "I'll do what I want, and you'd better not say anything about it!"
So let's return to those same statements.
"I'm Christian; I'm heterosexual." No one would object.
"I don't think you should be seeing [people of the same gender as you]; it is a sin." The response? "You're homophobic!"

As I said, I was only answering in brief. However, I hope that what I said sufficed. If not, I am amenable to continuing this conversation by e-mail.

Reply Return to messages