Subject: Yes that too
Author:
Posted on: 2014-03-20 19:45:00 UTC

It made much sense: my problem with some shippers who attempt to put Johnlock or Spirk into the picture is that they often attempt to change the characterization to shoehorn in things that they thought were cute but are totally out of character, or, like I said, they write Uhura out completely. In canon, both AOS and TOS, Spock has utmost respect for Uhura, so him being completely oblivious to the fact that she's completely disappeared from the fic is suspicious at best. Numbers 4 and 5 on my list of pet peeves are bad and lazy writing: later numbers are more about the prevalence of shipping taking over a fic whenever it's introduced and the fact that once some ficthors get characters pair up, they completely ignore the characters' assorted friends and family for the remainder of the fic. Even otherwise really good ship fics suffer from this sudden narrowing of focus, to the point where I can't tell you how many Johnlock fics I've abandoned because I knew that neither the unresolved mystery nor the rest of the cast were going to appear in the next five chapters once they got to the sex scenes, or how many Spirk fics conveniently forget that there's a starship to run. (Which isn't as much of a problem in AU's, but I like that starship, dang it! I've spent a rather long time watching it, after all.)

I'll be won over by plausibile and in-character alternate ships, especially in AU's, like 99% of the time. I'm more likely to heartily approve of the shipping in works where the rest of the cast remains in character and somewhat relevant too: this tends to me reading a lot of reeeealy long fics, because they're more likely to be whole cast fics. Personally, I think that the media would improve a lot with variety - both more leading same sex relationships and more leading male and female friendships, like you said. And you know what, ficthors would probably get better at writing a variety of relationships if the media were more willing to deviate from only glorifying heterosexual romances.

Reply Return to messages