Subject: ItÂ’s amazing how differently this could be read.
Author:
Posted on: 2014-02-03 13:11:00 UTC

To me, all this bickering actually made Ron/Hermione believable. Most of it was about small things and annoyed Harry because it seemed so unimportant. But that’s the point. By using any opportunity to dispute, Hermione and Ron made sure that they could agree on most of what was important to them, and that the small things they couldn’t agree upon didn’t really matter. This doesn’t seem to be the worst way to build a relationship.

The one big issue left in the end was the supposed House-elf Enslavement Curse. This was solved when Hermione watched Harry charming Kreacher without the use of magic, and when Ron realized that "we can’t expect them to fight for us". I don’t think that "How to Charm a Witch" had much to do with this. But I have to say that I was a little bit disappointed there. Shoving the house-elfs out like little children? Now when Ron had said "Somebody should tell them what’s up, so they can decide whether they want to run, hide or fight" – naah, I wouldn’t have kissed him anyway :-)

Also, I seriously hope that Harry and Ginny, after this first kiss in HBP, talked about some important things rather than just snoging before there was time to tell Harry about the Quidditch final.

I don’t understand why Harry and Ginny, or Harry and Hermione, or Ron and Hermione, or anybody else, should be “soulmates” (and Still-not-an-agent Androia Avatar asks whether being soulmates would make them canon Sues and Stus). Considering that "right over easy" is one of the big themes of the books, I wouldn’t expect this to be so easy. I’d expect that they all have to work on their relationships to make them work.

And now I’m wondering whether Jo really said something entirely new. But I have to see the full interview to understand what happened there.

HG

Reply Return to messages