Subject: Feh, 'dangerous'.
Author:
Posted on: 2013-11-14 22:08:00 UTC

C'mon, the Eldar had a thing where they would actually accept the surrender of any orc that offered it. None ever did, but the option was there.

In all seriousness (well, as serious as can be when discussing fiction): orcs are dangerous. But for most of the history of Middle-earth, they were dangerous in the same way that any enemy combatant was: you didn't want to fall into their hands, but there were front lines. Sure, you might get unlucky and stumble into a raid, but in general, 'home' was safe.

The main exception to this is the parts of the Second and Third Ages when Sauron wasn't around. That was when the orcs, for want of a better term, went feral: they hid in the mountains and occasionally scuffled with the dwarves. So that's less World War 2, and more guerilla soldiers (with a side order of cannibalism). Again, very bad news if you run into them - but they weren't exactly lurking in every alleyway.

Remember, orcs can't stand daylight. That's true right down to the War of the Ring. They really were just a mountain hazard, like, I dunno, rock giants? It's only under a Dark Lord that they became particularly mobile. The only orc war that wasn't under Morgoth or Sauron's direct control is the Dwarf-Goblin war - which, well, took place underground.

Could they have infested Mirkwood? In theory, yes - The Hobbit makes it clear that it was dark enough. Did they infest Mirkwood? The corpus says no.

So, Tauriel's parents? Unless they were with the Last Alliance, they would have had to hike to the Misty or Grey Mountains to get killed by orcs. It's not a very common fate.

(The time when it would have been common was after Unnumbered Tears - when Beleriand was overrun. But then, guess what? The Nandor took to the trees, and the rest of the Free People, once their various realms fell, fled to an island. They didn't just stick around in orc territory)

hS

Reply Return to messages