Subject: Yeah, the way she's described in Wikipedia...
Author:
Posted on: 2015-08-11 17:26:00 UTC

Is as intersex. Yes, androgynous once meant the same thing, but the meaning's shifted quite a bit over the years. The article should have clarified on that, but Skarm should have done a bit more research on the topic.

Wait, are we assuming he used Wikipedia? Um.

But yeah, for sensitive topics like this, you really ought to double-check with people so you don't end up offending anyone.

(And it would not surprise me if they weren't exactly internally consistent. It's been known to happen.)

Reply Return to messages