Subject: I agree. It was unsatisfactory.
Author:
Posted on: 2015-06-25 13:58:00 UTC
She didn't even turn into a dragon in the end! *cries*
Subject: I agree. It was unsatisfactory.
Author:
Posted on: 2015-06-25 13:58:00 UTC
She didn't even turn into a dragon in the end! *cries*
Because to me, it felt like it had all the hallmarks of a mediocre or bad fanfic. From whitewashing Maleficent to demonising and bastardising the King and fairies. The movie felt like it could've been a great morally grey movie (where both sides had their flaws and understandable reasons) if it chose to stay away from the black and white routine (by just switching the roles).
She didn't even turn into a dragon in the end! *cries*
Remember Hollywood is a business, so it might be that their focus testing has determined that the public do not really want new ideas, and would prefer to see the same things. Take for example this:
Ex Machina a very good, new, experimental film dealing with artificial intelligence, and what makes a human, human. It took about $ 36 Million world wide. Now lets compare this to Jurassic World, which is a sequel to Jurassic Park. Not a bad film, but no where near as good as the original. It has been out less than two weeks and has grossed over $1 billion dollars. Lets also look at the other top grossing films this year. Furious 7 and Age of Ultron. Both sequels. It seems that that is currently what the people want.
A list of top grossing films not adjusted for inflation
Looking at the top 100, there are 63 sequels and 13 stories based on well known tales. Or, put another way, 76 of the highest grossing films are derivative, in some way, shape, or form. 76%. It seems to me that the majority of what people want is the seemingly unoriginal stories. It might be the consumers, not Hollywood then.
I hadn't thought of it before, but yeah, it does have an awful lot in common with a certain subset of bad fanfics.
I didn't think it was a very good movie. I got a sense of what it was trying to do and it was very admirable, but I thought it was very poorly executed. Good ideas killed by sloppy and messy writing.
But I think Maleficent has more to do with the recent obsession with retelling the villains to be more sympathetic. I guess it's due to value dissonance between what was collected back in 19th century and how Disney wants to portray all characters as rich in detail and have every reason for their evil.
*hesitantly scoops up Huns the for-now-mini-Olaf*
But I like more the idea of mini-snowmen, the ones from Frozen Fever.
Mass Effect Andromeda or Mass Effect 3? From what I have seen Mass Effect Andromeda seems to have pretty solid expectations all around, ME3 was polarizing for a lot of people, but really only for the last 30 minutes or so. That's what people argue over, well usually, or if you are me then you argue over Vega. But from comments I have seen since its release, most people really have issue only with the last bit, now for some it ruined the entire game, others not so much.
Then again I am also not including the whole DLC Ending/Regular Ending. And I also forgot the day one DLC.