Subject: Makes sense.
Author:
Posted on: 2015-06-23 12:45:00 UTC

Some of the best villains ever were complex characters which you can despise for their actions but understand why the way they are.

I guess it all depends on how the tools of writing are used. The movie's attempt at humanising Maleficent isn't the worst, it's just that it came at the expenses of other characters' personalities.

But there's nothing wrong with villains who have no sympathetic reasons for their actions. Joker and Disney's version of Claude Frollo are examples of such. The first has such a mysterious background it is hard to tell if he a poor guy who went insane one day or a monster who only got worse one day while the second is frighteningly realistic like Huns from Frozen and Mother Gothel and there's hardly any reasons that excuse his actions.

Ands I hope the trend doesn't go like the 80's and 90's obsession with anti-heroes, and darker and edgier in comics (most tried pulling off Watchmen without understanding that the darkness and edginess was the by product of a compelling and well thought out story, and not that dark and edgy made the story work).

Reply Return to messages