Subject: So the SEP field isnÂ’t "technology"?
Author:
Posted on: 2015-02-18 11:29:00 UTC

I’m tempted to send the Uncanonical Department of Inaccuracies in to hit Makes-Things over the head with Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Since when does "technology" not work at Hogwarts? This fanon is apparently based on Hermione’s explanation why Rita "The Bug" Skeeter couldn’t bug Hogwarts. But Hermione talked only about electricity and some examples of electric or electronic devices, like microphones, recorders, radio etc.

Hagrid’s crossbow is technology. Harry’s watch is technology. Colin Creevey’s camera is technology. There’s no implication in canon that these devices are magical, and they work just fine at Hogwarts.

I'm sure that the TCDA’s steampunk equivalents of PPC technology would work at Hogwarts. And there is no reason to assume that futuristic sci-fi-technology would not work at Hogwarts as long as we don’t assume that all technology from fictional future worlds will always be an application of electricity.

HG

Reply Return to messages