Subject: HP Theory
Author:
Posted on: 2015-01-08 10:56:00 UTC

Dunbledore was certainly not above obliviating some Muggles if he deemed it necessary.

But weren’t the Dursleys always so concerned with what the neighbours would think of them? Wouldn’t they have tried to avoid anything that might have been noticed?

Yes, sometimes Vernon lost his temper and tried to beat Harry, so Harry learned to duck and to stay out of reach. But I’m not so sure that Vernon ever actually hit Harry; he may always have missed.

The original protection Harry got through his mother’s sacrifice worked only against Voldemort. But when Dumbledore worked his magic to give Harry extended protection at the place where his mother’s blood dwelled, why would he limit it to Death Eaters and Dementors, risking that some random mass murderer not associated with Voldemort might slaughter Harry and his family? Why would he set any limits at all?

My headcanon: Dumbledore didn’t need such crude spells like Obliviate to make the world go the way he wanted it to go. Having Harry been monitored by Mrs. Figg was mostly to keep track of what happened to Harry when he left the house. Dumbledore had made sure that no real harm could be done to Harry at Number 4, Privet Drive, and that any abuse Harry might have to suffer would only serve to make him stronger and to form the character we know, but would never go so far to make Child Protection come in and make Harry loose the best protection he could have.

Note: I’m not saying that what happened to Harry was not bad, and certainly he perceived it as really bad, but it could have been worse.

HG

Reply Return to messages