Subject: So I have two points.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-11-29 19:44:00 UTC

First of all--no, hold on. Pre-first of all: your thing with the names I *can't* I was actually laughing so hard I had to take breaks to look away and *breathe*.

Okay. Now. First of all: Unless I'm gravely mistaken, Biblical Hebrew actually does involve some discussions of more earthly matters--wars and rape and begetting children and leprosy and so on. I doubt it's so extensive (from what we know, anyway; doubtless there are many words that we just don't know) that you could have a complete conversation about day to day matters or sickness--that's what happened when Modern Hebrew was being created, from what I heard, they eventually had to make up new words so that they could ask someone to put the kettle on--but I believe there's enough to start with.

My second point is just an addition--for some centuries in Europe (idk if this applied to speakers of Ladino and every other Jewish language that isn't Yiddish or not) Yiddish was used as the spoken language--the day to day language--and Hebrew was only used as a written language and even then primarily for religious purposes (though there is this great thing about the Rothschilds communicating in Hebrew letters so that no one else could read it). Basically, it was a diglossic situation. Nowadays, of course, Modern Hebrew exists and is in use--but it had to be developed quite a bit to become an all-purpose language again.

And now I'm out of things to talk about (apart from 'say, speaking of parallels, I have one about German and Yiddish!') so I should probably do the sensible thing and go back to my essay. But yeah. Those are my points. And thank you so, so much for the naming thing, and if a werewolf!sons of Feanor ficlet appears...you know where it came from.

~DF

Reply Return to messages