Subject: Kaitlyn and I have been arguing about this.
Author:
Posted on: 2018-04-26 13:25:00 UTC

No, not the convention - we'd both love to go to that but also can't. The Speech-badfic thing.

Our compromise conclusion, reconciling the enactive nature of a wizard's Speech with the fact that accidental misspeakings haven't in fact filled the universe with rogue spells and dead wizards, is something like this:

Wizardry is the right to have the universe listen to what you say in its language. When the Speech is used in its enactive mode by a wizard, that's the equivalent of ringing a bell and summoning it down to pay attention. The universe doesn't have to do what you say - you might not have enough power, or your spell arguments might not be convincing enough - but it has to listen, and usually something will happen.

The rest of the time, wizards use the Speech non-enactively (in the simplest reading, this is just 'don't end a statement with the Wizard's Knot) - but they still have to watch what they say. They're not compelling the universe to listen - but it might 'choose' to do so regardless. That could be based on how hard you meant it (yelling 'go away' at someone, for instance), or could just be wizardry being wizardry. It's not prone to sticking within the boundaries people set for it.

hS

Reply Return to messages