Subject: I would never describe my wife in that way.
Author:
Posted on: 2019-01-21 15:54:00 UTC
Even if she does have an artfully-placed scar on her forehead...
...
omigosh
hS
Subject: I would never describe my wife in that way.
Author:
Posted on: 2019-01-21 15:54:00 UTC
Even if she does have an artfully-placed scar on her forehead...
...
omigosh
hS
Can I please ask where the 'of course' comes from with regards to MumsNet? The way you've phrased it, and I'm sure this is unintentional, comes across like you're painting a very large website with a very broad brush.
hS
Like, this is not new information; the whole forum's full of posts "debating" trans rights, most of which are an excuse for handwringing about how they're the ones who are really being oppressed by trans women doing unspeakable things, such ask them not to be exclusionary towards trans people, or exist. The MumsNet mods have also banned "cis" and "TERF" as slurs.
For more information, read this article from The Outline, which covers a lot of points about transphobia in British media in general and from ostensible feminists in particular.
Shouldn't be too much of an issue... hopefully!
hS
What a triumph!
-Twistey
The only exceptions are for wikis that aren't about pop culture media topics, so wouldn't fit under the Fandom heading. But we certainly do!
~Neshomeh
A class that uses DEX as its spellcasting die.
An amazingly elegant dancer-type character using only her enchanted blades as armour; a sneaky halfling using her magic to cross gaps and stay out of both sight and mind of the treasury's guards; a fine archer using his connection to the arcane to make unbelievable shots.
That sort of thing.
Even if she does have an artfully-placed scar on her forehead...
...
omigosh
hS
That ought to keep you safe. =]
I definitely think that it has some potential for creating unique characters like the ones you made (not sure how well Shale would work though. That's a lot of damage for an already low hitpoint class). But it also would allow for some kinda ridiculous combinations, like a fighter who multiclasses to wizard and casts with strength.
You want him?
But I'll take him only if neither of you want it.
-Twistey
I came across this idea on 1d4chan, and I have an image and a link.
https://1d4chan.org/wiki/MuscleWizard#Psion
<a href="https://1d4chan.org/wiki/File:Musclewizard.jpg">https://1d4chan.org/wiki/File:Muscle_wizard.jpg
Lost Tradition from Bastards and Bloodlines is the Feat I was talking about and they use it for Muscle Wizard.
-Phobos
I'd take the psion option for preference. It seems slightly simpler. Though I must point out that I don't know whether psions are any good in 3.0.
I'll be sure to send this to Willis, he might find it interesting. Is there a way that one could adapt it into 5e?
-Twistey
I think that this feat would allow for some ridiculous combinations, like a fighter who multiclasses to a casting class and uses strength as their casting stat. We don't want to feed the munchkins!!
Could be some universal-but-not-official rule where it's like "This feat only works if you're primarily a caster." Or something.
Meanwhile, in the process of making my own Order of the Bumblebee parody, I'm finding this quite useful because my caster selves' cast stats represent what I at the time felt was my greatest/most useful trait out of all the D&D ability scores.
-Twistey