Subject: Wait, there's more!
Author:
Posted on: 2020-04-17 18:31:13 UTC

I wanted to see for myself where the next extant story after Intel1 fell, because fact verification is a virtue. I keep forgetting FF.net's timestamps are localized, so when I saw that 642410 falls on 2002/03/06 for me, I was very confused about how it could come before -- -- 04. Then I remembered, had a look at -- -- 04, and found that it falls on 2002/03/06 for me, too.

I wondered how FF.net localizes the timestamps, so I took a peek at the source code around the publication date to see if I could figure it out. I did a little research on what I saw, and discovered that modern FF.net is using Unix timestamps, which give a number equal to the number of seconds that have passed since "standard epoch of 1/1/1970" in whatever timezone you're in.

This means we can use a converter to give us a very specific time of publication. So:

642404 = utime 1015470612 = Thu, 07 Mar 2002 03:10:12 GMT

642410 = utime 1015470704 = Thu, 07 Mar 2002 03:11:44 GMT

If the timestamps are accurate, those stories were posted minutes apart. We know near enough exactly when Architeuthis posted Intel1. {= D Convert to GMT -6 (margin of error 1 or 2 hours either side), and it was a little after 9 PM in the US, which sounds pretty likely to me!

So let's have a look at the TOS1 bracket.

576527 = utime 1012377600 = Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:00:00 GMT

576546 = utime 1012377600 = Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:00:00 GMT

...

Lemme double-check that.

...

Yeah, the timestamps are identical. So that's less helpful than I'd hoped. I don't think it's very likely those stories and everything in between were posted at exactly the same second. FF.net is guessing.

How broad a guess is this? Looking at other stories around the same publication date, it looks like most of them the hour of 08:00:00 GMT (though I saw one 07:00:00 GMT). That's interesting. Is FF.net based on the West Coast? Why, yes. Yes it is. Which means they're placing stories at (usually) 00:00:00 Pacific time, i.e. the earliest possible hour on the day in question.

So the day is roughly accurate, at least. Phew!

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages