Subject: Oh yeah!
Author:
Posted on: 2020-06-10 01:53:44 UTC

Wow, thanks! Huh, I thought I’d have more to say about how happy I am to have permission, but there’s not much. Uhh... thanks again?

Oh, you do not understand, Neshomeh. Gamer is Goku.

Okay, he’s not, and is not intended to be. I see your points. I was going for building functional machines. Cliches are to be exterminated. Also, who needs complex numbers when you have negative complex numbers?

Oh, darn! They were actually young children (about 5). I had a sentence pointing that out, but it sounded really weird so I removed it. Relocating the information must’ve slipped through editing...

Whenever I think I have a mastery of English grammar, it’s like concepts I’ve never heard of appear just to spite me. A “conditional ‘were’” has never been brought to my attention in my life.

For the record, I read this article about the think/thing thing that now I think I should have another think about. Thing is more used nowadays so I thought I could go with the more common version. Then again, if think is really right, I think I have another think coming about the think/thing thing that I think I’m confused about. Though I’m thinking that the think/thing thing I’m trying to confuse you with is just another thing that I think I should go with the older definition for.

Whew, that was a mouthful. This was really jumbled up and probably could be improved. But do I feel like doing that? No. I feel like celebrating! 🎉 🥳

Reply Return to messages