Subject: re: Beginning+20
Author:
Posted on: 2022-03-09 04:05:09 UTC

Hey, she's a fellow bio major?! I didn't remember that! I didn't stay for grad school, though.

I think this is only the second time I've read Architeuthis's spin-off, to be honest. She really delivered a ton of firsts in this short little ficlet, didn't she? While Black Katana started the recurring fourth wall break of PPC staff getting recruited from tHe ReAl WoRlD, Archie not only runs with that concept, but also introduces the idea that weird agent names are privacy measures, using elements of other spin-offs as "free-to-use" (in this case, using Makes-Things to explain the function of modified tech), and, uh. Raising the age rating with swear words, wow. Didn't remember that in here! Also, holy crap, holo-combat? I thought the idea of the HQ holodeck arose from our in-house Hunger Games, but here it is, way back in 2002! Did everyone else think the holodeck was a modern development for the setting, or am I just the pure idiot in the room?!

Also also, it's interesting that both Katana and Architeuthis went with present tense for their main narration, even though it's typically seen as a rather niche tense to use. I wonder if they intentionally changed it up to differ from the original series? Or maybe Archie was following in Katana's footsteps? Either way, I have to hand it to Archie for that extremely smooth tense transition between the infodumpy portion and the ficlet. It's in just the right spot, and so subtle, I had to go back after the fact and look at where it happened.

Some of the introduction's commentary about Suvians is getting uncomfortably outdated at this point, unfortunately, especially the very surface-level characteristics and equating Suvians with idealized author inserts. But at least there's acknowledgement later that "it isn't always immediately obvious that an O.C. might cause damage" later on, so . . . progress?

Interesting that the "invisible to canons" concept was originally attributed to the canon itself, rather than SEP fields. Feels weird that the canon would grant greater protection to some field agents for doing more direct work, even though both roles contribute to restoring canon. I actually like the detail that spies have to take more reasonable disguises in, since they're not serving an antagonist role the way assassins do.

—doctorlit is too tired to come up with a clever signature phrase

Reply Return to messages