Subject: Response (also with SPOILERS)
Author:
Posted on: 2012-01-27 19:46:00 UTC

First, thanks for taking the time to put this up. As I believe Phobos said, a well-rounded review is always worth being seen. {= )

Re. direct quotations, were there any spots in particular you could point out, for reference? If we didn't clearly portray what was going on, there's definitely a problem there; but if we did, I'm not so sure. I don't want to make anyone have to read the badfic personally to know what we're talking about, but if a paraphrase does the work, why quote? People do have the option of looking at the badfic if it's just a matter of curiosity.

SPOILERS AHOY!

Bleh, I didn't know there was an almost-dying trend going on. I sympathize; we could've broken the RA some other way if we'd known. {= /

Since it is what it is, though, I do have to disagree that the RA is a deus ex machina. Typically, these save the day through some magical-seeming means that wasn't previously established, when the author has obviously written herself into a corner that wasn't planned. The RA, on the other hand, had been in the story the whole time, and even if its sentience is in question, I can't recall seeing any Harry Potter spell pass through a solid object to affect its target. Also, while it does save Decima, it does not save the day. In fact, it creates another problem the agents have to solve. So, while any plot device loses its punch if it's overused, and I regret that the sequence had to be viewed in that context, it doesn't make this one a god-on-a-machine.

Ironically, the entire point of killing the RA was to respond to a different trend, of killing anything but the RA, as though it's sacrosanct. The Ironic Overpower even gets us out here. {= P

Anyway, thanks again for posting up your comments. It's always a pleasure to disagree with a real critic. {= )

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages