Subject: Re: Interesting! Well...
Author:
Posted on: 2009-11-26 01:58:00 UTC

Hmm. It's a curious one, effort. I think you may have a point, but perhaps in a roundabout way. Consider my usual exclamation of shock and surprise: out loud, where ' is a glottal stop and capitals denote the emphasised syllable, I would say 'kiNELL. Typed, I wouldn't say f*cking hell. I might say bloody hell, which is only one letter less, or I might, more likely, say Christ on a proverbial, which is rather a lot more to type, and also rather a lot less strong a swearword, and also a lot more complicated semantically.

I think I swear a lot out loud for the same reasons I drink to a degree the rest of you find odd: I grew up in a culture where swearing is the norm. F*cking has become a very versatile word, with a variety of meanings dependent on subtle subtexts, intonations, contexts, body languages, and formalities. It's usually not even used as an expletive. I can see why I'd either cut the f*ckings or else bowdlerise them online, for the sake of the people I'm talking to; I certainly had enough conversations when I was a rebellious teenager, online, with people who objected to my swearing, and I've come to recognise their point about appropriate registers. I can also see that not everyone views these words the way I do, and I can temper my language to converge with them.

The bit that I'm particularly pondering is the fact that I don't use the f*ckings when talking online to people I know in real life. My brother, for example - out loud, it's at least one apparent expletive per sentence, and yet online, I use nothing stronger than a bloody or a bugger. I'm not talking the difference between the spoken "So he f*cking comes to me and he f*cking ses this, and I thought f*ck that sh*t man, if he's gonna f*cking think that he can f*ck right off" and the written "He said this to me, and I thought sod him, because if he's going to think that then sod him."

...

Except actually, I am, in a way. Note the way the written version lacks the effing adverbials - that's a score for you in terms of effort. But I wrote the above without thinking, and the online version has sod in place of f*ck; the spoken version took effort to type that the written version didn't. Adverbial expletives are easily lost because they add nothing to meaning; they only add emphasis in spoken language. But what about the verb? Why have I changed that? Why do I change it to something less strong, even when talking to people to whom, out loud, I'd use the strongest language at my disposal?

I'm clearly not altering my language in order to not offend my brother in the example, because he hears me use all sorts of colourful language all the time out loud. So there's got to be more to it than just degrees of formality.

As for time taken to type, I've been considering that bit, and I think it's more about transience - out loud, all your effing and blinding is gone as soon as it appears, but online, it stays, and it's binding in some way that I haven't worked out the specifics of yet (help?).

Reply Return to messages