Subject: *fails a tiny bit* (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2009-11-12 13:20:00 UTC
-
how's this for a power? by
on 2009-11-11 21:47:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Agreed; much too much. by
on 2009-11-12 03:01:00 UTC
Reply
Also, why would you be drinking biscuits? That sounds unpleasant.
~Neshomeh -
Re: Agreed; much too much. by
on 2009-11-12 03:51:00 UTC
Reply
Actually, what I do is mix them together until the biscuits are reduced to mush, then drink it :)
Well spotted. -
I'm with Techno-Dann; it's too much. by
on 2009-11-11 23:38:00 UTC
Reply
The essence of the PPC is that we're never going to finish our job; that's why the sadistic Flowers have so many Rules in the first place. What you suggest would be efficient, effective, and absolutely no fun. Who wants to read a story like that? It's effectively the Mary-Sue version of a war game.
That said, if you scaled it down immensely and put in a lot of problems that cause your agent's minor advantage to often malfunction, backfire, or otherwise be a source of humour without breaking the general PPC agent mold... that has potential. You'd have to run it by the Board first, though. -
Re: I'm with Techno-Dann; it's too much. by
on 2009-11-12 00:23:00 UTC
Reply
I'll find a good idea eventually
-
Like he said, by
on 2009-11-12 05:41:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Hoisted by my own petard! by
on 2009-11-12 05:47:00 UTC
Reply
...I don't know why I ended every plural in that post with an apostrophe. I'll blame it on NaNo and it being almost one AM where I am.
-
You may want to re-read the Original Series... by
on 2009-11-11 22:42:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Re: You may want to re-read the Original Series... by
on 2009-11-11 23:20:00 UTC
Reply
Can I be a jarate master then? Jarate is supposedly "jar based karate" but it really boils down to making enemies weak by throwing jars of urine at them.
-
Back to an earlier point... by
on 2009-11-12 00:00:00 UTC
Reply
You really should read The Original Series. The PPC has a rather unique feel to it, just because a power isn't grossly overpowered doesn't mean that it'll fit well. There have been rather powerful Agents who fit in, and I could fairly easily write one who would be a perfectly normal person... and yet be completely and utterly the opposite of what the PPC is trying to do. (Huinesoron already did, actually...)
So, read TOS. It's a very good read, and ultimately, if you haven't read the original material, writing fanfic is rather hard... -
Re: Back to an earlier point... by
on 2009-11-13 02:34:00 UTC
Reply
Just want to make sure I explained the jarate thing properly (For those who don't play tf2) before proposing something else:
Becoming a jarate "master" only takes as long as you need to piss in a jar.
Enemies who have been hit by jarate lose the will to live (At least in the game).
This probably wont work on "ebil" sues, who always seem to have some weird fetish. -
Is it absolutely necessary? (nm) by
on 2009-11-13 13:15:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Is it absolutely necessary? by
on 2009-11-13 13:51:00 UTC
Reply
I don't think so. It strikes me as annoying gross-out humor. *shrugs*
-
Re: Is it absolutely necessary? by
on 2009-11-13 23:10:00 UTC
Reply
scratch that idea then
-
Re: Is it absolutely necessary? by
on 2009-11-14 01:32:00 UTC
Reply
Bathos for the sake of bathos has always annoyed me. heck, it was one of the reasons I couldn't finish Canterbury Tales.
-
Re: Is it absolutely necessary? by
on 2009-11-14 03:38:00 UTC
Reply
i know what pathos is but what is bathos?
-
bathos is... by
on 2009-11-16 09:27:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
*points to Canturbury Tales* by
on 2009-11-16 09:37:00 UTC
Reply
I'll just, uh, leave this here.
-
*snickers* by
on 2009-11-16 22:56:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Re: *snickers* by
on 2009-11-16 23:31:00 UTC
Reply
True.
But IMHO, he could have left out the fart jokes. -
Nooo! Fart jokes to the end! by
on 2009-11-18 06:36:00 UTC
Reply
Also, fart jokes would be scatological humour, not bathos :P (sorry, sorry, just have to defend my beloved bathos until the end :) )
-
I suppose. by
on 2009-11-18 07:15:00 UTC
Reply
Youwin this time, Trojanhorse. You win this time.
-
It was well-fought *bows* by
on 2009-11-18 07:20:00 UTC
Reply
And you can call me Trojie :) Everyone else does.
-
Re: It was well-fought *bows* by
on 2009-11-18 09:20:00 UTC
Reply
Well then, Trojie, 'tis nice to meet you.
-
Re: Is it absolutely necessary? by
on 2009-11-14 06:33:00 UTC
Reply
Pandering bathroom humor.
-
I dunno... by
on 2009-11-11 21:56:00 UTC
Reply
I'm just as much of a newbie as you, but those powers almost seem a bit OP.
This isn't a RP, after all, it's fiction writing.
WoG would probably be a better answer for you though.
*Is just going with a vanilla brit who failed the psych exam for the Met and is good with firearms* -
Re: I dunno... by
on 2009-11-11 22:00:00 UTC
Reply
Whats OP stand for?
And how can I make it less roleplaying-y? -
Re: I dunno... by
on 2009-11-11 22:03:00 UTC
Reply
Overpowered.
*shrugs*
Check the wiki. If anything, the sues would have that whole materialization power thing. Agents are relatively normal for their races, in general. -
Re: I dunno... by
on 2009-11-11 22:06:00 UTC
Reply
I figured that as long as I balanced how easily the minions died and how much firepower i could have at one time I could get away with it (Especially in universes like one piece where the main characters can fight entire armies and win)
And isnt one of the agents some kind of supernatural being in human form who chooses to limit her power? That's sort of where i got the idea. -
Actually, yes, but. by
on 2009-11-12 07:16:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
*shrugs* (nm) by
on 2009-11-12 06:56:00 UTC
Reply
-
You've already been told no, that should be enough. by
on 2009-11-11 23:02:00 UTC
Reply
Besides, considering Dann is a Permission Giver, if you apply for Permission with that it'll likely be a reason for you to be denied, anyway. So it likely won't go through.
-
Re: You've already been told no, that should be enough. by
on 2009-11-11 23:03:00 UTC
Reply
I wasnt actually applying for anything. sorry
-
I meant in the future. by
on 2009-11-11 23:07:00 UTC
Reply
That if you go for permission with that idea still in mind, it'll be a reason for denial.
-
Re: I meant in the future. by
on 2009-11-11 23:10:00 UTC
Reply
is there a wiki article on what's commonly acceptable? My other idea probably wont fly either
-
Re: I meant in the future. by
on 2009-11-12 00:14:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Not exactly, no. by
on 2009-11-11 23:32:00 UTC
Reply
It's more a common-sense thing.
-
*shrugs* (nm) by
on 2009-11-11 22:27:00 UTC
Reply
-
Sage by
on 2009-11-12 13:15:00 UTC
Reply
Exactly.
-
*fails a tiny bit* (nm) by
on 2009-11-12 13:20:00 UTC
Reply
-
Sage by
on 2009-11-13 05:32:00 UTC
Reply
It just had to be done, how could i not?
-
*smacks upside the head* by
on 2009-11-13 05:48:00 UTC
Reply
Heh