Subject: Response to Ansela
Author:
Posted on: 2009-05-15 12:52:00 UTC

“I, personally, gave up on logic in Pokemon a long time ago. I don't think it's meant to make sense, but just to entertain. It's a fantasy world with different rules etc.”

But what would the rules be? After all, we wouldn’t want Christopher Paolini getting away with all the weird stuff in Eragon by saying “this world has different rules,” would we? :P Most fandoms have different rules to our universe (magic, starships et cetera) but whether or not those rules are explained is a different matter.

“Evolution could just be a case of 'I'm too powerful/experienced for this form now, I need to be at the next one to continue getting stronger.' There are exceptions, of course (i.e. Ash/Satoshi's Pikachu and its ability to defeat almost anything), but most things evolve once they're strong enough.”

Yeah, about Pikachu, why doesn’t it ever evolve and can still beat up everyone? I mean, surely some other Pokémon should have objections to evolving as well.

“I believe it was mentioned somewhere, perhaps in the Pokedex of one of the games, that Eevee has an unstable genetic code and therefore can evolve into whatever Pokemon is attuned to the stone you use on it (about seven or so now I think).”

An ‘unstable genetic code’? The only thing I can think of is that it means is that it’s missing pieces… which sounds ridiculous.

“People do age in anime, most of the time, but Pokemon is just weird with its non-aging. The Digimon Adventures 01 characters were older by the time of 02, to use your other mon-anime example.”

Yeah, but that was due to it being set later on (and with new characters). Pokémon’s being going on for years now with the same core characters (mostly).

“Good luck with figuring out Pokemon logic and science.”

Thanks. I’ll probably need it.

Reply Return to messages