Subject: Not inexplicably. More like inadvertently. Bluh. (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2014-02-16 08:11:00 UTC
-
On triggering missions... by
on 2014-02-16 08:07:00 UTC
Reply
Is there any sort of protocol for when Agents are inexplicably triggered by the mission they're serving on? Because I'm working on one fic that begins the relationship between Spock and the Sue with all the hallmarks of an abusive relationship, and Christianne is starting to get triggered.
Where they are isn't a blatant breach in the Canon (it's only the 3rd chapter, and the first obvious breach is in chapter 12), other than the gross misuse of the term t'hy'la and your standard misuse of soulmates. Would it be wise to kill the Sue now or to wait out the triggering parts in a convenient plothole? -
PSST. BETAS WANTED. by
on 2014-02-17 07:40:00 UTC
Reply
This mission is now completed and I need some betas to look it over before I post it. The mission is set in Reboot Trek. Any takers?
-
I will! by
on 2014-02-18 00:17:00 UTC
Reply
While I'm only moderately familiar with Star Trek, hopefully I'll still be helpful here.
-
I volunteer! by
on 2014-02-17 18:30:00 UTC
Reply
I own both of the reboot films, and am moderately familiar- if not exactly keen on the reboot, but I'm willing to beta for it! Email is BattleNOSPAMaubergine @ gmail . com remove spaces and NOSPAM.
-
Added you to the doc. (nm) by
on 2014-02-17 18:32:00 UTC
Reply
-
Beta by
on 2014-02-17 18:25:00 UTC
Reply
I'll do it. It's not my primary fandom set, but I know quite a bit about star trek, old and new.
-
Chuck me thy email. (nm) by
on 2014-02-17 18:31:00 UTC
Reply
-
email by
on 2014-02-17 20:29:00 UTC
Reply
mkkeener@mail.com
-
Added you to the doc. (nm) by
on 2014-02-17 20:52:00 UTC
Reply
-
I don't think there's protocol as such... by
on 2014-02-16 09:17:00 UTC
Reply
... But I will of course defer to those older and wiser than me.
An Agent being triggered could make for many kinds of interesting stories, depending on what you want to do with it.
Would it be an option to hide somewhere and just watch the Words? Or for Christianne to stuff her ears and close her eyes and just let Eledhwen watch the bad parts and tap her on the shoulder when they are over? -
That seems to be the current game plan. by
on 2014-02-16 21:50:00 UTC
Reply
On a somewhat-related note, any idea how to contact Tungsten Monk to see if I can borrow the concept of the Fictionary? I need an excuse for Christianne to suddenly be able to determine what is canonical and what isn't in this mission; she's only versed in the reboot movies and the Original Series, and I'm imagining her pulling out Trek trivia from the Fictionary like one would go about using the Memory Alpha wikia.
-
Yep, you're good. by
on 2014-02-17 19:29:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Oooh. by
on 2014-02-17 19:35:00 UTC
Reply
What I have is that Christianne is using the Fictionary to give her a better understanding of the Trek canon as a whole, kinda like a pocket version of the Memory Alpha wikia.
Maybe her Fictionary unit has some way of inputting searchwords to tell her if the things are canonical or not? It could tell her sarcastically that something's about as canonical as a cuddly Klingon or something. -
I recommend... by
on 2014-02-17 20:10:00 UTC
Reply
reading "Tough to Take" to get a better idea of how it works. I don't think it's sophisticated enough for a word search; or at least, the original model wasn't. In any case, I'd be wary of making it so awesomely useful that it's an acceptable replacement for someone who actually knows the canon. It shouldn't make their job too easy, and it shouldn't be an exposition crutch for the writer; that way lies the deus ex machina that Diocletian was afraid of.
~Neshomeh -
It's not that particularly DeM, as far as I know. by
on 2014-02-17 20:20:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
This raises new questions. by
on 2014-02-18 05:45:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
But this is! by
on 2014-02-18 12:35:00 UTC
Reply
This, I mean.
hS, unable to resist a literal metaphor -
Five people, actually. So it is a bit of a crowd. by
on 2014-02-18 05:57:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Actually... by
on 2014-02-18 15:27:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Oh, since they were in a plothole with Spock at the time... by
on 2014-02-18 16:57:00 UTC
Reply
...of them griping about the uncanonical species, I had them ask the not-replaced Spock if he's ever heard of the species in question. Would that count as an observation (via asking characters) or do they still have to directly witness the things to charge for them?
-
Okay, so I can write out the Fictionary for that one. by
on 2014-02-18 16:33:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Sounds about right. by
on 2014-02-17 20:05:00 UTC
Reply
It makes similar commentaries in its previous appearance, and being able to look up and compare canonicity of certain in-universe concepts seems like a logical extension of its previous pseudo-CAD readout function, with the added bonus that the new function would cause the Fictionary's name to make a little more sense. As it is now, it's more like an Electronic Handbook of the People of _____ Universe.
-
I'm sure you can use it. by
on 2014-02-17 15:12:00 UTC
Reply
I think the unwritten rule is that any new PPC tech is free to use unless stated otherwise, like Flowers. But, since I'm going to talk to her this afternoon anyway, I'll ask just to be extra-sure. {= )
~Neshomeh -
Fictionary... by
on 2014-02-18 04:04:00 UTC
Reply
Reading the wiki page, what's supposed to really make it distinct from a CAD, aside from it occasionally getting snippy at the agents?
-
I don't understand the question. by
on 2014-02-18 04:39:00 UTC
Reply
Are you concerned about the writing of the article, or the device itself? 'Cause it's pretty clear to me what the differences are, but I read the source material, sooo... O.o
~Neshomeh -
Waaaaait nevermind I get it. by
on 2014-02-18 04:55:00 UTC
Reply
Sorry. I'm stupid like that; realised the purpose of the device only after publicly questioning said purpose. :P
-
Moreso the device, yeah. by
on 2014-02-18 04:45:00 UTC
Reply
Basically, what I was saying reading it over (wiki page and mission, which I'm rereading to be sure) is it didn't seem to do much that CADs don't, aside from going into a bit more detail. That could be my head being all stuffy though.
-
Invoke Starfleet regulation 619. by
on 2014-02-16 08:36:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
The Toucan Limit is Brilliant by
on 2014-02-16 14:45:00 UTC
Reply
It's just great. That's all.
-
Hm. by
on 2014-02-16 08:44:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Hoo boy, sounds like a doozy. by
on 2014-02-16 09:01:00 UTC
Reply
That's some pretty messed up stuff coming from Spock. Not being given the option to withhold consent because of some Vulcan soulmate voodoo? That's some prime crazy right there.
Let me guess: he's heavily possessed or full-on replaced in the fic, right? -
As he is also a major sappy horndog, by
on 2014-02-16 09:02:00 UTC
Reply
I would veer on the side of replacement. It reminds me or Stulock Holmes too much to be mere Possession.
-
Sappy stuff is the worst. by
on 2014-02-16 09:12:00 UTC
Reply
I've never been a taker for a romance subplot: I found it distracts us from the awesome action we could be seeing. Plus, there's just so many ways it could go horribly wrong, as evidenced by most badfics involving Lust Objects.
-
It's funny because I'm using this mission to develop... by
on 2014-02-16 17:26:00 UTC
Reply
...my Agents' relationship. There are still discussions that they haven't had, despite this mission taking place months after the Blackout.
Romance subplots are cool, but this is less of a subplot and more of a plot. A bad plot, but still a plot. There's stuff about the Sue's bracelet being Speshul later, which heralds something like an actual non-romantic plot, but it creates three entire species to get at it. -
Whaaat? by
on 2014-02-17 05:32:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
They appear after we do the Duty. by
on 2014-02-17 05:58:00 UTC
Reply
It's too painful for my Agent to tough it out to when the uncanonical aliens appear. Christianne's already had a panic attack, and they've gotten more than enough charges.
But still, good food for thought. -
of* (nm) by
on 2014-02-16 09:03:00 UTC
Reply
-
Not inexplicably. More like inadvertently. Bluh. (nm) by
on 2014-02-16 08:11:00 UTC
Reply