Subject: [In a nutshell...]
Author:
Posted on: 2014-02-15 22:01:00 UTC

Hold on, I think I wrote this up for hS's PPC community documentary... yep, here it is:

The "So Sue Me incident" refers to a Board-wide discussion sparked by a blog post by well-known Mary Sue advocate Boosette in April 2010. Broadly speaking, the post was an essay claiming that the term "Mary Sue" shouldn't be used because it is inherently misogynistic, and that criticizing characters by calling them Sues is no better than bullying young female writers who are empowered by writing such characters. It came to our attention because Boosette specifically named the PPC as perpetrators of misogyny and bullying.

Some PPCers initially reacted with anger, and some regrettable things were posted in the heat of the moment. The bulk of PPCer responses were surprise and confusion, though, since many of Boosette's specific claims about what Mary Sues are and what we do were less than accurate.

Araeph expertly dissected the post's more dubious claims in her response, posted to the PPC LiveJournal and linked from the Board. She pointed out that Boosette's definition of "Mary Sue," which included the notion that Sues could be "too flawed" and encompassed canon characters generally regarded as non-Sues by PPCers (such as Tamora Pierce's Keladry of Mindelan), differs greatly from ours. She also rebutted Boosette's claims of misogyny: for one thing, Araeph showed that Mary Sues themselves almost always conform to damaging ideals such as supermodel looks and physique and the notion that the romantic love of a man (often a dangerous man) is the only path to happiness. For another, she explained that Mary Sue's gender is a byproduct of demographics, not the deliberate targeting of women: since most fanfic writers are female, naturally most bad fanfics are written by women, and therefore most of the fics we spork will have been written by women. This response led to the creation of a new section of the FAQ: For Other People—The Gender Card.

Boosette's accusations of bullying were a little better founded than her claims of misogyny, and as a result many of us took a long, hard look at the PPC and saw ways we could improve. Neshomeh dedicated another long LiveJournal post to the subject, having arrived at the conclusion that we should 1) eschew even offhand remarks about fanfic authors in our missions and all community spaces, and 2) strive to offer more constructive criticism rather than just writing missions. The dialogue leading to and following her post led Neshomeh to re-write PPC Wiki's Mary Sue article so that it no longer defined Mary Sues in terms of their relationship to their authors, but rather their relationship to the canon and the writing and plot of their stories.

There was also a push to write more non-Sue-centric missions—we do have a host of other departments for the purpose, after all—which sadly didn't last, causing the departure of at least one Boarder. Others found that they couldn't shake Boosette's accusations and departed or faded away for that reason.

By and large, though, the incident proved to be a learning experience, one that has made us more mindful of the words we use and how they affect our fellow fanfic writers.

I don't really know how I'd render that in the Protectorate of Plort universe. {= / Any thoughts?

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages