Subject: Okay, so...
Author:
Posted on: 2016-01-12 12:21:00 UTC

I'm the sort that likes to see what stories would look like in a new AU setting, and I like seeing where the differences and similarities might be. Besides, M-e would be in serious trouble without the Shire, imho! ^^

1. Tougher hobbits lend themselves to either a) less freaked-out Bilbo, or b) more freaked-out Bilbo, which I like better. I kind of like to think about B greeting his first unexpected guest at bowpoint lol. I imagine the hobbits distinguish themselves from the chaotic, roughshod Big Folk by their code of respectability and manners. Also, they do have closer ties with Bree, but they believe the people of Bree to be subject to fanciful thinking and/or undue panicking.

2. If there aren't goblins in the Misty Mountains, that means Bilbo & Co. would either a) need a different excuse to drag them down there so B can get the ring, perhaps Sméagol himself, or b) they don't go underground into the Mountains at all, which would mean B would have to find the ring elsewhere.

3. I imagine the Witch-Queen doesn't exactly like Gandalf/Mithrandir, and wouldn't be too happy about a group going back to reclaim Erebpr and it's surrounding lands. So there's a potential conflict. She may even send troops to stop them.

4. So our Company includes Thorin Oakenshield, Gil-galad, and Arathorn for sure, along with perhaps Elrond, a smattering of dwarves (Fili and Kili? Balin?), and a few men.

4. I was under the impression that the less power in a ring of power, the less power it had to stop aging, etc. I don't know how Sméagol would have have gotten a more powerful ring. Am I just making stuff up in my head or is that a thing?


Just saying, tougher hobbits is *the best* thing since ever.

Reply Return to messages