Subject: Not particularly similar.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-01-13 09:04:00 UTC

The Hobbits moved west as a sort of general theme. Hobbit origins are a bit vague, but they clearly originated in the East, and headed west to escape Sauron. They eventually settled as far from Mordor as it's possible to get without getting frostbite. I think those imperatives should be broadly similar.

The Eotheod, on the other hand, didn't migrate: they moved. In T.A. 2510, the Steward of Gondor asked them for aid against a massive attack. Eorl the Young rode out of Framburg and defeated the minions of Sauron at the field of Celebrant (just north of what we know as Rohan).

In return, the Steward granted Eorl and his people a massive chunk of land - then known as Calenardhon, but renamed Rohan. Apparently it was much nicer than their old homeland, squeezed between two mountain ranges and Mirkwood. They never went back.

But in this timeline, the Eotheod are allied with Erebor, and Erebor doesn't have vast tracts of land to give to them. So they stay where they are, and the Witch-Kings of Gondor have to win their own battles.

hS

Reply Return to messages