Subject: Seemed to work for me.
Author:
Posted on: 2015-12-18 01:29:00 UTC

Sometimes (Algie is a prime example of this) characters pop fully-formed into my head at some point during an RP and I have to write them down before they escape. Most of the time, however, this is not so, and while it's generally speaking a bad idea to start from a "wouldn't it be X if" standpoint, I've been known to make it at least vaguely work.

Case in point, my most famous agent: The Notary. She's a bit of both, having been invented entirely so I could take part in a Board event called the Continuity Council of Gallifrey-In-Exile. Rather than make yet another renegade Time Lord, I wanted one who was the epitome of everything wrong with Time Lord civilization: a malevolent, vicious, spiteful, petty-minded bureaucrat convinced of her own self-worth. The Notary's character and backstory grew and grew as the RP wore on until she became the character we know and kind of tolerate today.

Teaming her with Wobbles was deliberate on my part too. It was my attempt to do something a bit more interesting with the prevailing agent dynamic while still fitting the two-power rule. One's an introvert, one's an extrovert, one's the funny guy, one's the straight man, but it's filtered through a certain amount of cynicism. Wobbles is a completely unironic happy clown, except she's only like that because she's a disabled angstfic blip and likely an emotional cripple. The Notary is just the worst lifeform in the history of ever, but her past self was a full-on heroic Time Lord in the universe-saving business and she remembers what it's like and what her hatred gets her.

But they both started from the point of view of "wouldn't it be funny if the agents were a sulky bureaucrat and a literal clown?"

So it can work. You just have to think about it a little more than normal. =]

Reply Return to messages