Subject: I think he meant. . .
Author:
Posted on: 2017-05-04 20:55:00 UTC

Unless I am wrong - unless there is something that does fit that description - I feel the appropriate response is to make it clear what the problem is (which has been done by this thread), make it clear that any further incidents may result in a ban, and give Bramandin one last chance to prove that she can overcome her unspecified mental health issue and function as a member of this community.

And he mentioned that you give off that vibe, not that you actually said it. In fact, it's possible that he posted before he saw that made it clear that you did expect her to apologize when you said:

I see that I did not explicitly state that functioning as a member of this community would include making amends for this incident. I should have.

The problem is that second chances stop being as valuable after they've been given a fourth time, especially in the absence of an apology or a sign of remorse.

Someone brought up Scapegrace, a situation I'm ridiculously far from expert in, but know something about. I don't think that Scape should be thrown out for having done similar, but that's because I've seen her admit she was wrong, apologize, stick around for the criticism, and work to better herself.

Reply Return to messages