Subject: Fair question.
Author:
Posted on: 2017-05-03 09:54:00 UTC

Thanks for extending me the opportunity to clarify.

In this case, it's the fact that Matt Cipher's post was a general message, which, to me—and I think to Iximaz, though obviously I can't speak for her—is an important distinction.

I didn't see Matt Cipher as specifically addressing JulyFlame, but as addressing the females of the PPC, of which JulyFlame is a member.

I'd like to think that if a similar situation occurred, wherein Bramandin made a post similar to Matt Cipher's which included Iximaz's, we'd have had the same conversation with Ix if she'd decided to take the issue personally.

In this case, Bramandin demanded an explanation from Iximaz despite repeated requests from Iximaz not to do so.

I thought it was wrong when Matt Cipher pursued JulyFlame for an explanation. The confusion, I think, arises from the fact that I also thought JulyFlame was wrong for taking an expression of goodwill that happened to include her as a personal attack.

In this case, Bramandin isn't extending goodwill toward anyone of the gender Ix is a member of, but— however unintentionally —hounding Ix for an explanation of a perceived negative opinion, real or imagined, and in the face of very clear requests to stop. To go back to the example of JulyFlame and Matt Cipher, Bramandin is doing something very similar to Iximaz, and the prevailing opinion was that it was wrong then. I think it still is.

--Aegis, hoping that cleared things up slightly more than it muddied them.

Reply Return to messages