Subject: That's . . . uh, problematic, a lot.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-10-28 22:04:00 UTC

Partly because the accounts of Caribs as cannibals are questionable (at the very least, to what extent).

As to the Mound-Builders, ie. the early Mississippian chiefdoms (now known as Chickasaw, Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Occaneechi, Shawnee, and several more) - I don't know that they'd be "distant ancestors" so much as in the moment. They were still living around and adding to the mound complexes when the second wave of Spanish conquistadores made landfall. (Hernando de Soto was pretty clear about where they lived.)

Reply Return to messages