Some of the more adjusted members might have been Lawful Neutral, but the harrassers are definitely Lawful Evil.

—doctorlit, Neutral Good, but toeing the line into Chaotic

I am attempting to get a script together for an adaptation of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde, because I reckon that most of the adaptations out there have too much unnecesary romance and other unnecesary bits as well. So far, I am mostly taking my dialogue from the book, with a few changes and a scene or two which I thought up myself. When I get it up to scratch, I am hoping to use it to make a radio theatre/audio dramatization.

They typically at least need to start out as writing. Even Shakespeare needed to provide his actors with a script! And while you can argue that they're meant as directions to the actors, and not as content to be consumed in and of themselves, there's nothing wrong with making them available to be read. I've certainly read far more screenplays than I've seen performed, even as movie adaptations. (And I got decently invested in Cursed Child when I read it last year! I agree that a lot of the character moments fell flat without having narrative prose around the dialogue, but many such conversations were still quite good, and the overall plot didn't suffer for it.)

Bah, I've veered off quite a bit, haven't I? My point is, the perception of the Pit's founders that "scriptfic bad" shouldn't have wormed its way into the site rules and cut off an avenue of expression, especially for, you know. Literal teenagers who have no resources to produce actual stage performances!

—doctorlit: clicks "Preview," then "Create Post"

. . . although reading a songfic is hardly a replacement for listening to a song, so they're not in actual competition. "I was going to buy the new Taylor Swift single, but then I read part of the lyrics in a crossover Enjolras/Sherlock Holmes fluff, so I now I don't need to!" Just never happens.

—doctorlit has an extensive library of song lyrics stored inside the folds of his brain