I have contacted some other authors via Discord, but for you specifically, the only way to communicate is through Board post; you don't have a clickable email. (I also just wanted to make it so anyone could see it.)

I'll be happy to delete the older images of yours, and anyone else who wants me to do so.

I'm not sure I want to automatically assume that deleting images is the answer; some of the authors I've talked to over Discord very much did not want their older agent images deleted, and I think deleting images without asking would be much worse than simply adding them to pages. At the very least, one doesn't need to be an admin to remove an image from a page.

--Ls

Also for Nursery Children and PPC Enemies, because why not.

~Neshomeh

I only need to do that once per template in order for it to apply to every infobox that uses the template. Since I intend to make the field hidden unless it contains data, it won't even show up on existing infoboxes. All effort to edit individual pages will be completely optional.

~Neshomeh

Just wanted to poke my nose in to add that Agent Dax (D&D changeling) changes gender as quickly as bodies and switches pronouns mid-sentence. I use male pronouns for him as default because that's his preferred body, but she was born female and her natural body is just as much Dax as his elven form is just as much Dax as any other body he slips into. Genuinely I don't know what I would put for his gender because "fluid" feels like a gross understatement. :P

I'd put Laduquac and Ave in both Male and Female. Because there's no law that says we can't. {= )

For Sam and Alex, you could go wild and put them in all three; they are Schrodinger's Gender, each and all and none at once.

Most of the Glossary lot have associated pronouns, I think. I'm sure some don't, but I would be fine failing to capture 100% of all named characters. Not like the wiki captures 100% of everything else anyway, but we try. Sometimes. (♪ And if you try sometimes, you might find~~ ♪)

But nah, this is purely academic; I'm not mad about not going ahead with it. Just felt it worth pointing out that solutions exist if we wanted them. {= )

~Neshomeh

And one thing I may add: any transgender characters, or such would be easy to find linked in that very article on the subject. Not sure we need a separate category for it.

Other than that, I'm really not sure there'd be any particular benefit to having a category for male and female agents. Sure, other wikis do it, but it's not as though we're obligated to use any particular categories simply because other wikis have them, and as hS said, it just doesn't seem all that likely to be useful, at least in comparison to the workload it would give us. Consider the number of pages this would require an edit of: we've got around 900 Agent pages, 200 Staff pages, and 100 Flower pages--editing all that just to add redundant information (whether via infobox or category) easily obtainable already seems entirely unnecessary to me.

Oh, and speaking of unnecessary categories, I don't even like the "agents of color" category, because it rather implies (at least to me?) that agents are by default white (and human!), which is... not great. I also think we should axe the "inactive agents" category because it's not consistently applied, and I think the "retired agents" category works better in-universe. Of course, these are just my opinions, so take them as they are.

So, yeah, don't think it's worth it.

--Ls, having a bit more to say now that it's not really late at night