Subject: Thoughts on concrit.
Author:
Posted on: 2012-06-08 03:58:00 UTC

First, thanks for responding. I think most everything comes across pretty well; the only thing I'm confused about is whether you mean the Rule 4 in the original Constitution or the Rule 4 in the current, revised Constitution, since they're not the same. The "certain episode" seems to be intentionally vague, though I can guess what you mean.

So, regarding concrit, I definitely know what you mean about being afraid to leave reviews—I expressed some of this in my reply to PC. I don't think anyone ever meant to say that leaving reviews that aren't essay-length constructive criticism isn't allowed, though. Those of us who really, really want and thrive on concrit were mainly getting fed up with the majority of "mission reviews" taking the form of "Oh wow, that badfic was bad. Glad you sporked it!" and little else, if anything. We already know the badfic is bad, that's why we sporked it. A mission review should be about the mission.

But (and I'm writing this for my own benefit as much as anyone else's), you can give concrit without making it into an essay. Just being a little bit specific about what you liked, and why, can be good. "Funny, I especially liked when X because Y" is still concrit, because it tells the author a particular thing about what they did right that they can identify and use in the future. Even just "Good work, I really felt bad for your agents when X happened" tells the author she successfully had you sympathizing with her characters at that particular point. Theoretically, each individual reviewer picks up on something slightly different, or the same thing in a different way, and so a bunch of small but specific reviews like this can add up to a lot of good information for the author, just as good as one long concrit essay.

Does that help? I'm going to try and take this to heart myself.

~Neshomeh

Reply Return to messages