Second (and biased) opinion. by
Neshomeh
on 2009-04-08 03:17:00 UTC
Reply
I suspect that RCs continue to be favored because a) they are traditional, b) they make for better story points, and c) they can't make the agent pair seem overpowered.
The main differences between TARDIS and RC are that the TARDIS is mobile in space and time and much, much bigger on the inside than it looks from the outside. The RC, on the other hand, is fixed in time (though it's HQ time, which is rather flexible) and space--you can't take it into the fic with you and bop around in it like you can with a TARDIS. RCs are also notoriously tiny, though some are better-designed than others. It just depends.
The thing is--and I'm revealing my bias here--a TARDIS pretty much eliminates the need for some of the usual PPC tech, like a portal device, and it also means that the agents don't run around through the story on their own legs, whatever shape those legs happen to be at the time. In doing so, it also eliminates many possibilities for an interesting (and funny) mission. If the agents can just sit comfortably in their TARDIS and watch what's going on around them, what fun is that?
That said, no one is going to stop you from putting your agents in a TARDIS if you want to when you have Permission... but it will make me sad if you do.
~Neshomeh, stodgy old traditionalist.
Expand this post →
Very briefly, as far as I know... by
Sedri
on 2009-04-07 06:13:00 UTC
Reply
TARDIS' started to be used during the Macrovirus Epidemic because they were moveable whereas RCs are (supposedly) fixed locations. RCs are the norm, and the use of TARDIS' is recent, which is probably why you don't see many of them.
Not using one myself and not being greatly familiar with it all, I could be wrong. Best get a second opinion.