Subject: I can tell you why.
Author:
Posted on: 2014-05-01 16:34:00 UTC

You write 'a-GENTS' - but the natural reading is 'A-gents' for most people. That's a trochee, not an iamb, and slapping it up against an iamb - 'A-gents a-MASS' - tends to blue the two into each other; it reads as 'AGE-ntsa-MASS'.

What Iximaz is looking for is 'AG-ents MASS to POOL their MIGHT'. I seem to recall that there is a word for clipping off the first half of an iamb, but I don't know what it is. I do know that the 'AG-ents' reading is an example of trochaic subsitution - as in 'WHETH-er tis NOBL-er IN the MIND to SUF-fer' - which also ends in an amphibrach, of all things! Honestly, this 'Shakespeare' bloke - who did he think he was?

The point is, Iximaz is right that it sounds a little off - but it's also perfectly valid. And if you're willing to suffer the slightly wrenched accent of 'a-GENTS', it's not even that.

(Also, I never said, but I was really impressed by your working 'labyrinthine' into it)

hS

Reply Return to messages