Nah. I'll build my shack next to someone else's, and we're already halfway there.
This list is also available as a Atom/RSS feed
-
Re: Impossible. by
on 2009-03-21 01:12:00 UTC
Reply
-
Well, why not? by
on 2009-03-21 01:12:00 UTC
Reply
Someone has to do it, and he's written enough to qualify for the role. Besides, it still fits with TOS, doesn't it?
By the way, I think the line's being smudged
-
Apparently. by
on 2009-03-21 01:12:00 UTC
Reply
Can I have the link? I'm morbidly interested to see just what kind of mission required that much stuff.
-
Indeed it is. And who wouldn't choose to be happy? by
on 2009-03-21 01:12:00 UTC
Reply
Happiness is what we all strive for, after all; everything we do is in pursuit of joy - lots of people get bogged down in money or power as a means of being happy and forget to be happy in the progress, but it's still the truth. Bomb-builders are the same; they're convinced the only way they can be happy is to get rid of apparent threats to their happiness, which apparently includes the rest of the world.
So it's human nature. That said, I'm going to be very human and watch the cat play with her fluff-ball. If the world ends tomorrow, then that's the memory I want to keep. :)
-
I'm not very nice. ;) (nm) by
on 2009-03-21 01:11:00 UTC
Reply
-
Or, on a serious, theoretical note... by
on 2009-03-21 01:10:00 UTC
Reply
Droids would do perfectly- they've been used for such purposes in several canons.
-
Re: It's just fanwank, I should really relax by
on 2009-03-21 01:10:00 UTC
Reply
- And to annoy people, apparently, heh. The point is, nobody likes the Death Star idea, so it should be dropped already.
2. The Sun Crusher having one pilot doesn't have anything to do with more than one being built.
3. Everything has to have some internal logic to even be possible. The PPC is a comedy, but that doesn't have to mean it's totally stupid.
- And to annoy people, apparently, heh. The point is, nobody likes the Death Star idea, so it should be dropped already.
-
then surely it's mean to deprive us of our ignorance (nm) by
on 2009-03-21 01:09:00 UTC
Reply
-
*does the naievety dance* by
on 2009-03-21 01:08:00 UTC
Reply
Sure thing. Because I'd much rather have bliss than spend an uncertain amount of time stressing about the possibly-or-possibly-not impending apocalypse :D
-
Honestly, the horde of suckups really annoys me. by
on 2009-03-21 01:08:00 UTC
Reply
I was just joking about how many of them there are. They're like, 90% of the board, to the point where it's practically his story and not Jay's or Acacia's anymore.
-
DBS mission, so you'll have missed it (nm) by
on 2009-03-21 01:08:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Rebuttal by
on 2009-03-21 01:08:00 UTC
Reply
We have all the multiverse at our disposal. Man it with slaves. Or the Borg, once they're done with the nukes.
-
It's just fanwank, I should really relax by
on 2009-03-21 01:07:00 UTC
Reply
- Wow. See above; also, it isn't my project. I'm just making an argument for fun.
2. How?
3. Since when was PPC HQ logical? As you said, irrelevant.
- Wow. See above; also, it isn't my project. I'm just making an argument for fun.
-
Re: It built itself up before, it'll do it again by
on 2009-03-21 01:06:00 UTC
Reply
If they want to naively deny the fact that they're about to die horribly in a nuclear apocalypse, whatever. Ignorance is bliss.
-
Impossible. by
on 2009-03-21 01:05:00 UTC
Reply
If anyone were even alive, post-nuclear-apocalypse it'd be impossible to rebuild a society.
-
Except for the ones who snap/go rogue. by
on 2009-03-21 01:04:00 UTC
Reply
Honestly, I'm surprised there haven't been any FicPsych escapees turned Omnicidal Maniacs...
-
That is in fact the point. by
on 2009-03-21 01:03:00 UTC
Reply
Black is traditional...
-
Re: Rebuttal by
on 2009-03-21 01:03:00 UTC
Reply
- There's no way that's an advantage. It'd take at least thousands of Agents to crew it, and that's thousands of Agents not doing missions instead of embarking on this stupid project of yours.
2. Irrelevant.
3. Logically, it can't, no structure can. Technically, the only thing holding HQ together is the portal network.
- There's no way that's an advantage. It'd take at least thousands of Agents to crew it, and that's thousands of Agents not doing missions instead of embarking on this stupid project of yours.
-
I have known many rabbits of that variety. (nm) by
on 2009-03-21 01:02:00 UTC
Reply
-
True, but we all have to fear the Flowers' punishments (nm) by
on 2009-03-21 01:01:00 UTC
Reply
-
Dead Suethors, actually. The Sues would still be around. (nm) by
on 2009-03-21 01:01:00 UTC
Reply
-
Rebuttal by
on 2009-03-21 01:00:00 UTC
Reply
- That might be considered an advantage- less likely to have a single loony go and give canon planets the Carida treatment.
2. If they have one, why'd they need to make it again?
3. I was under the impression that, by its very nature, PPC HQ has an infinite amount of space.
- That might be considered an advantage- less likely to have a single loony go and give canon planets the Carida treatment.
-
*shrugs* Not my area of expertise. But of course... by
on 2009-03-21 00:59:00 UTC
Reply
Debate in all forms is welcome, until it gets to the point of mudslinging, when the PGs - and Board at large - have every right to tell people to stop. So argue as much as you like. :)
-
Excuse me, but what Federation ship/multiple portals thing? by
on 2009-03-21 00:59:00 UTC
Reply
I don't remember anything like that. When was that used in the PPC?