Subject: So, huh.
Author:
Posted on: 2016-06-28 19:30:00 UTC

As someone who has, since learning of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, always wanted to be in Ravenclaw, it surprised me that I did not get the closest equivalent House, Horned Serpent. I'm apparently a Pudwudgie. One of the questions should have been "How do you handle open wounds?" That would have weeded Pudwudgie right out. But, anyways, after complaining, I'd say just one thing about this.

If Huinesoron is right, and Thunderbird is really the house for idealists and activists, it could be the most positive incarnation of... wait for it... Slytherin! Slytherins are known for their ambition and their cunning. An activist would basically be a Slytherin with the ambition of change. They don't like how things are, so their endgame is to change it. Of course, this could just be my crazy theory that all Slytherin's aren't so bad, and it used to be a rather pleasant house full of people who would later change the world before the pure-blood fanatics gave it a bad name and decent sorts who would otherwise have gone there begged desperately to go anywhere else, causing a general downward spiral. Think about it- ambition is not necessarily evil, especially if the ambition is, say, to gain love, or to effect change for the better. What's evil is ambition without bounds- ambition willing to do literally anything get what it wants. Gryffindor is Fire? So is Slytherin. Carefully bound by laws of morality and ethics, a Slytherin is a powerful force for good, like a fire in a fireplace. Left unbound, and it destroys everything while trying to feed itself, like a wildfire. ... Wow, I just went on a rant about how Slytherin isn't evil. Didn't expect that to happen. Sorry about that. Also, I guess we know why Voldy's so evil.

TL;DR: Thunderbird = Slytherin in proper, Slytherin =/= evil, Granz really doesn't like people assuming Slytherin = evil, and Ilvermorny is the reason Voldy's evil.

Reply Return to messages