Subject: Parody, caricature, and pastiche (and quotation).
Author:
Posted on: 2022-03-07 11:26:20 UTC

As of 2014, UK law (under which the Estate has written this FAQ) provides the following as Fair Dealing defences against a charge of copyright violation:

  • Research and study (so Tolkien scholarship and Elvish dictionaries should be okay).
  • Criticism or review (which might cover the PPC).
  • Reporting of current events (so you can call Putin Sauron if you like).
  • Parody, caricature, and pastiche (see below).
  • Quotation, for criticism, review, "or otherwise".

I contend that all fanfic falls under one or more of the fourth category.

  • Parody - imitation for humourous effect. There's a lot of this about, including published stuff (Bored of the Rings et al). There is no requirement that the names be changed in a parody, so anything which pokes fun at Middle-earth would fit.
  • Caricature - simplifying or exaggerating the subject matter, including for entertainment purposes. This covers a lot of badfic! If Legolas is sparkly and perfect, and Boromir is an evil monster, you have a caricature defence.
  • Pastiche - combining text from various sources, or imitating the style of another author. This is your serious fanfic, which tries to sound like Tolkien. It's also how you defend using names and events from the books, if you're not using the Quotation For Otherwise defence.

Whether these defences will be accepted depends on the usual US fair use concepts - how much you've used, and if you're impacting the copyright owner's profits. But I reckon, if it ever came to a court case, fanfic would make an excellent showing of itself.

hS

Reply Return to messages