Subject: option 1 (nm)
Author:
Posted on: 2011-09-23 23:34:00 UTC
-
Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 01:45:00 UTC
Reply
I have been thinking, and I know others are with me on this, that we need a few more PGs. The ones we have at the moment have either disappeared or have been consumed by Real Life. So, I propose we start nominations for at least two new PGs.
First nomination is for Miah. -
So... by
on 2011-09-22 00:46:00 UTC
Reply
The question I have is this: When are we moving on to the voting stage? Or are we delaying due to current events?
-
Re: So... by
on 2011-09-22 19:20:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
2 by
on 2011-09-24 01:59:00 UTC
Reply
Nominations are non-binding, no need to go through and nominate all the same people again.
-
option 1 (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 23:34:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 2 (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 23:31:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 2 (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 21:00:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 2 by
on 2011-09-23 19:27:00 UTC
Reply
And I'll decline my nomination.
-
2 (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 19:27:00 UTC
Reply
-
I vote 1. (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 19:20:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 2. by
on 2011-09-23 08:53:00 UTC
Reply
As someone else pointed out, it's the voting that counts. If it turns out that one of the people who was nominated is actually the incarnation of primordial evil (which I don't think happened... unless I missed it?) we can just... not vote for them.
hS -
Re: Option 2. by
on 2011-09-23 23:34:00 UTC
Reply
Well, is it too late to nominate Cthuhlu? Because if not, we can still get primordial evil on the list.
-
Vote for Cthuhlu by
on 2011-09-23 23:40:00 UTC
Reply
Why cast your vote for the lesser of two evils?
-
Option... 1. I think. 2 would be acceptable (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 08:33:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 2. by
on 2011-09-23 02:51:00 UTC
Reply
I don't see a need to restart, if people can just cast new nominations. I agree with Data, mostly the same people will be voted in.
-
Option 1 (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 01:30:00 UTC
Reply
-
Either 1 or 2. (nm) by
on 2011-09-23 01:24:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 2 by
on 2011-09-23 00:25:00 UTC
Reply
Most of the same people will probably be nominated, and it's the voting itself that counts anyway.
-
Option 1. (nm) by
on 2011-09-22 22:52:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 1 (nm) by
on 2011-09-22 22:17:00 UTC
Reply
-
Option 1. by
on 2011-09-22 22:15:00 UTC
Reply
I'd say we should start again, with a clean slate.
-
Option 2. (nm) by
on 2011-09-22 22:14:00 UTC
Reply
-
I agree, option 2 by
on 2011-09-22 19:47:00 UTC
Reply
Recent events may have changed who people will vote for, but honestly going through the process of nominating the people we do want to vote for again just sounds like too much work.
Then again, I'm kind of a lazy jerk, so maybe that shouldn't count. I dunno. -
Option #2 (nm) by
on 2011-09-22 19:27:00 UTC
Reply
-
I vote Option 1) Restart. (nm) by
on 2011-09-22 19:23:00 UTC
Reply
-
Nominating DML by
on 2011-09-19 04:47:00 UTC
Reply
I'm terrible at coming up with specific reasons for things, but I think he'd be good at it. Uh... yeah.
-
Seconding DML. by
on 2011-09-19 04:54:00 UTC
Reply
DML is a good guy at heart, with a great eye for detail. He puts in 200 percent to all work he does and wrote one of the best, most comprehensive Mary Sue definitions I have ever seen. :)
-
Thirding DML! (nm) by
on 2011-09-19 09:35:00 UTC
Reply
-
Fourthing DML (nm) by
on 2011-09-19 12:49:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-19 01:33:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 18:46:00 UTC
Reply
Everything I have to say on the matter has probably already been said, but here goes.
I was surprised to see FlareShard nominated so quickly - she only got permission two days ago - but, thinking about it, I think she'd be great for the job. She's clearly a good writer and able to tell good writing from bad, and she's quite active in the community, and always keeps in the spirit of the PPC. She'd have my vote. -
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 17:51:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Declining... for now by
on 2011-09-19 20:58:00 UTC
Reply
Miah, I'm seriously honored that you'd suggest me. I appreciate it and it makes me happy.
However, you're right when you say that I haven't started writing missions yet; and I think to be a good PG, I would have to have a few under my belt, because in order to know what makes a good agent I'd need to have some experience using agents with various traits in missions.
When I do have some missions done, go ahead and re-nominate me the next time the question comes up; but for now--I'm just not experienced enough. Thanks anyway, though. -
Addendum by
on 2011-09-19 21:00:00 UTC
Reply
I am totally willing to beta people's fics, give advice, etc. I'm good at grammar and I like to collect little factlets, and I want to be more involved anyway. I'm on the beta list, but so far I haven't been asked that much--so consider this an open invitation to anybody who needs a grammar/spelling/style/fact check. Two sets of eyes are better than one!
-
Humbly accept by
on 2011-09-19 01:26:00 UTC
Reply
I know I've only done one mission and it was a while ago, but I do enjoy looking over works other people have done. I do plan on sticking around, as I do like the community.
-
Decline Nomination by
on 2011-09-18 18:52:00 UTC
Reply
Which is why, I think, I'm going to have to decline that nomination. I'm flattered to have been nominated at all, but it is a valid point that I haven't been around lately.
Give it a few months, let me prove that I'm able to stay around, and I think I'd stand a much better chance. -
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 17:27:00 UTC
Reply
Miah and Tranum(Tray-Gnome?) for me.
-
So... by
on 2011-09-18 17:43:00 UTC
Reply
I think I thirding Tray-Gnome at this point would be unnecessary, right? If it isn't, I'm thirding him.
-
A few more cents on Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 16:52:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Don't know if I agree. by
on 2011-09-18 17:34:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Re: Don't know if I agree. by
on 2011-09-18 19:09:00 UTC
Reply
We have quite a few PGs who were around before the IRC and haven't touched it. What about them?
[jokingly]Obviously they need to get with the times. Come on, you fogies! Embrace modern technology already![/jokingly]
As for the Community Experience bit, that's just what I would prefer. That's nothing against you or any other PG without a published mission to their name. -
Sometimes it's just hard. by
on 2011-09-19 07:42:00 UTC
Reply
Honestly, I tried being part of the IRC way back when, but but my time zone means that it's very hard for me to be there at times that most of you are. In the end, it just wouldn't be possible even if Real Life wasn't eating me alive, and I'm sure that's true for a lot of other PGs. That said, I avoid making the final call on a Permission request from someone who has been active almost only on the IRC. I think that's fair.
-
A thought by
on 2011-09-18 19:24:00 UTC
Reply
I think you are right about the need for community experience, PC. However, I think you are coming at it from the wrong end. I believe it is far more important for them to have read and have a knowledge of the PPC canon and spin-offs than to have written any of it.
-
I think I would still prefer hands-on. by
on 2011-09-18 19:31:00 UTC
Reply
I see it as the difference between studying a video game on its associated wikia site or TV Tropes page verses actually playing it for yourself. You can get a great grasp of the material that way, no doubt about that, but it isn't the same experience as if you sat down and played it. Or wrote it, going back to the PPC as an example.
-
Re: I think I would still prefer hands-on. by
on 2011-09-18 20:06:00 UTC
Reply
I think it is the difference between playing a video game and creating a video game, actually. Since one is experiencing what another has created, versus creating something yourself. I have never created a video game, but I know a good one from a bad one, when I play them.
A Permission Giver needs to be able to distinguish good writing from bad, but you don't have to be a writer to do that. The Permission Giving process has little to do with their abilities as writers, but everything to do with them reading. -
Hmm. by
on 2011-09-19 07:43:00 UTC
Reply
I think there are arguments for both sides. For myself, I would prefer that all PGs have written at least one piece of prose in the PPC world, even if it's not a mission.
-
Let us agree to disagree and move on. (nm) by
on 2011-09-18 20:09:00 UTC
Reply
-
Fair enough (nm) by
on 2011-09-18 20:12:00 UTC
Reply
-
Points made, and well. by
on 2011-09-18 16:04:00 UTC
Reply
I second the nomination for FlareShard, and add a nomination for
Tray-GnomeTranum. He's quick to joke, slow to anger, and has done very well both on his own and with co-writers so far. And from what he's said in the chat, he's good at dealing with groups of people (reading kids Lovecraft totally counts!), so as long as he doesn't go into shock and/or kill me for nominating him...
(He's a zombie squirrel from Gunnerkrigg Court! What could possibly go wrong?) -
*tosses in some nominations* by
on 2011-09-18 15:57:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
That said, I'm afraid I can't accept this. by
on 2011-09-18 19:05:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
You know... by
on 2011-09-19 07:38:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Please read! by
on 2011-09-18 15:39:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Miah for Permission Giver! (nm) by
on 2011-09-18 14:23:00 UTC
Reply
-
Support both Miah and FlareShard. by
on 2011-09-18 11:39:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
My two cents by
on 2011-09-18 11:03:00 UTC
Reply
I would support Miah as a Permission Giver. FlareShard? Eh... no. New blood is all very well and good, but I would prefer someone with more experience within the community.
-
My vote. by
on 2011-09-18 10:06:00 UTC
Reply
Seconding the vote for Miah. I can't really say about FlareShard, but I'm leery of giving the PG Hat to anyone who's only just got Permission themselves.
-
Addendum: NOMINATION by
on 2011-09-18 12:28:00 UTC
Reply
I nominate WarriorJoe for PG. He's been around a decent amount of time, has always come across as level-headed and has a good grasp of the spirit of the PPC.
-
A concern by
on 2011-09-18 15:43:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Fair point. by
on 2011-09-18 16:09:00 UTC
Reply
Don't feel like a jerk for voicing concerns. The last thing we want is to vote in someone who's not right for the community. I would second the concerns about Maslab, he does have a tendency to start and be involved in drama. My concern for Joe is more on the basis that, for one, he's not very active on the 'Board, and two, he feels we as a community need more infrastructure/rules/ways to punish or deal with people who break rules. And I'm not really comfortable nominating him without first knowing that the community on the whole also feels that way.
-
Response by
on 2011-09-18 16:47:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
I think Miah would be a good PG too. (nm) by
on 2011-09-18 10:05:00 UTC
Reply
-
*struggles up from Real Life* Seconding Miah! by
on 2011-09-18 09:25:00 UTC
Reply
I can't say anything about FlareShard as I just haven't been aroung enough to know. And... how long has Flare been around? My knee-jerk reaction to giving PG status to someone who only just got Permission is negative, largely because lots of people tend to vanish shortly after getting, but if there's enough of an argument...
-
I second both nominations. by
on 2011-09-18 08:17:00 UTC
Reply
'cause they're both awesome.
-
Which two? by
on 2011-09-18 15:16:00 UTC
Reply
'Cause there are more than two.
~Neshomeh -
Fifth Miah! by
on 2011-09-18 06:47:00 UTC
Reply
Miah is a really good choice, and FlareShard too! I'll...second? Third? her nomination. Miah has been here a while and is very dependable. FlareShard is new and has a lot of spirit, already has a bunch of co-writes lined up. Good planner, that one. :P
-
Miah! by
on 2011-09-18 06:38:00 UTC
Reply
I... fourth? the nomination for Miah.
I can't honestly vote for or against Flare Shard, what with me being gone the whole summer. -
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 05:39:00 UTC
Reply
Another vote for Miah
-
Seconding Miah, nominating FlareShard. by
on 2011-09-18 02:47:00 UTC
Reply
Expand this post →
-
Votes and whatnot by
on 2011-09-18 18:23:00 UTC
Reply
FlareShard may be enthusiastic, but she's been around for barely two months. Energy doesn't equal leadership. Nothing against her personally, but it's simply too soon.
-
Oy! Miah! Come accept your nomination! *clamors* (nm) by
on 2011-09-18 10:01:00 UTC
Reply
-
I third Miah... by
on 2011-09-18 02:33:00 UTC
Reply
... but since I post on here once every blue moon or less, I can't really say who else I'd suggest.
-
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 02:00:00 UTC
Reply
Seconding Miah, and nominating Maslab as well. Dude's proved he's fairly rational most of the time both on the IRC and as an admin in another community.
-
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 02:14:00 UTC
Reply
I am going to be honest here. I have seen Maslab instigate a fair bit of drama in the IRC. I don't think that is a good thing for a PG.
This is, obviously, just one man's opinion. I would like some more people to weigh in so we get a better picture. -
seconded... (nm) by
on 2011-09-19 02:00:00 UTC
Reply
-
Re: Permission Givers by
on 2011-09-18 12:17:00 UTC
Reply
I would agree on that point--I really don't think Mas is the best option for a Permission Giver. If I'm being honest, he has a tendency to draw out issues longer than they need to be considered, which is not a good trait for a PG.