Subject: Hm...
Author:
Posted on: 2013-09-12 19:57:00 UTC
I don't know how much use my arguments would be for Sebak, since most of them have to do with feelings invoked by the work. There are a couple academic things I can point to, though.
In a word, craftsmanship. Tolkien put a massive amount of work into Middle-earth, and it shows in the snippets of languages, poetry, and history that pop up throughout the tale. It's the kind of thing where you get out of it what you put into it. If you're only reading for the adventure story, that's all you'll get, and yeah, it's not your modern action-packed mile-a-minute romp. It's slow, it digresses, it rambles.
But if you take the time to study it, though, to learn who those people in the songs are, and why there are ruins on Weathertop, and where the Dunedain came from, and the real-life inspiration behind the Rohirrim—and let me just take a moment to say alliterative verse. My mind was blown all over again when I got to college and learned what alliterative verse is, and how he chooses to use it is just perfect, and . . . .
Ahem. Sorry.
Speaking to characters for a moment. Again, I think the issue that people have is that everything about them isn't necessarily right there on the page, so if you're not interested in their motifs, archetypes, symbolism, etc., there's not much there. We don't delve into their psyches a whole lot, and few of them are the type to spill everything they're thinking through their dialogue.
To appreciate Aragorn, for instance, you have to bear in mind that he's old, he's been living like an exile in the wild his entire adult life, and he's not even allowed to be with the woman he loves unless ultimate evil can be destroyed and he becomes king, redeeming the humongous screw-ups of his ancestors who could have prevented this whole mess in the first place if they'd just listened. This quest, while having the highest fate-of-the-world stakes you can possibly get, is also seriously, brutally personal for him. Just because we never hear him complain about it doesn't mean it doesn't weigh on his mind and influence every single decision he makes. So, when he chooses to follow Merry and Pippin instead of Frodo and Sam, or to look into the palantir, or to take the Paths of the Dead, the risk he's taking is enormous, not just for Middle-earth, but for him personally. Every decision is agonizingly risky, but he chooses to take the harder path anyway, because it's just that goddamn crucial. Meanwhile, he still manages to find the time to say a few kind words to poor Eowyn, heal the stricken, and generally act like a compassionate and caring guy. Aragorn is freaking awesome.
What else...? Oh, I happen to love Tolkien's sense of humor. Yes, he has one. No, it does not involve dwarf-tossing and troll boogers. -_-; It mostly comes from the way joy and laughter can surprise you, I think, so naturally the hobbits are the chief source. You get moments like Gimli waxing poetic about the Glittering Caves in the aftermath of the Battle of Helm's Deep, or Merry and Pippin having a smoke atop the ruins of Isengard, or Sam going on about how their adventures would make a great story someday. It's like... wow, guys, this is what you choose to fixate on at a time like this? Really?
And the answer is "Yeah, really," because otherwise life just wouldn't be worth the long, hard fight.
I guess what I'm trying to say is, Tolkien is an academic's dream, but a casual reader's nightmare. Sebak, as an academic, can find all sorts of things to appreciate through study and contemplation of the background details, themes, mythology, inspirations, and broader contexts of the work, whereas Tish, who's looking for a fun, exciting ride, won't find it here. There's nothing wrong with either approach to reading in general, it's just that, when it comes to Tolkien, one will reward you forever and the other one won't.
I know that probably sounds elitist even though I don't mean it that way... I'll just add that it's really, really okay if you don't love Tolkien. People don't have to love all the same things equally. That would be stupid.
~Neshomeh