Subject: Yeah, that makes sense.
Author:
Posted on: 2012-04-04 20:01:00 UTC
Maybe it's an issue of defining concrit in terms of its potential usefulness in and of itself, rather than in terms of how likely a given author is to use it.
When I think of concrit, I tend to include both suggestions for how to improve the current story and how the author can improve their writing in general for the future; I tend to think the two are inextricably linked. Improvement right now could be impossible for a variety of reasons, though—there are cases like this, where the author doesn't (currently) have the skill required, but also cases of the piece in question being an old and/or completed work that the author has no intention of revising again simply because they've moved on. Concrit of a finished or abandoned piece can still guide the author to greater success in a future work, so even though improvement right now is impossible, it's still constructive to provide recommendations for improvement later.
Whether it's worth the time to do this for a given fanwriter is a personal decision, but I still think it counts as concrit regardless of their ability or inclination to use it.
Re. common sense: If only it were!
~Neshomeh