Subject: I can understand that.
Author:
Posted on: 2012-04-06 01:18:00 UTC
For myself, an author's receptivity and/or the ability to improve the story in question are inextricably linked to my giving constructive criticism. If I feel that it is next to impossible for a story to improve because of anything I say about it, it makes me think I'm wasting my time critiquing it, instead of having fun with a PPC/MST of it.
But in this case, my reviewing the story was a very good thing! I won't call it constructive criticism (at least, it might be by your definition, but not by mine), but there's a good chance that the story will be taken off, and I can say with confidence that the author's writing has improved. That's not something you can say about every writer, especially on the Pit.
On another note...
Have you ever noticed that the people who seem to turn to writing goodfic (or at least, less awful badfic) have always been the younger writers? It seems, at least to me, that despite pro-Sue groups harping on the fact that we criticize works by younger fans, the younger writers are the ones who benefit the most from our criticism. Conversely, the longest, most painful Suethor diatribes I have seen have usually been from the writers in their late twenties or early thirties (I know there are several in the "insanity" memories of Deleterius). My guess? It's much more galling to be a 33-year-old who's just discovered she writes dreck than to be a 13-year-old who's discovered the same thing.
In fact, the only other author who responded to my concrit favorably was the you-Sue author who's Sue stole Jack's ship. She was 13, and she reformed her OC! So, to sum up, thanks for reminding me to send the review, and I see no reason why we can't have Constructive Criticism: Definitions One and Two.
~Araeph