Subject: That's not fair to Gandalf.
Author:
Posted on: 2014-01-06 09:15:00 UTC

This actually comes up a few times in the books. It's Gandalf who persuades Elrond to let M&P join the Fellowship (he was going to send members of his household), and later - after Gandalf is dead - someone (Aragorn?) comments that they should never have brought them - it was Gandalf's idea, and he was the first to die.

But Gandalf wasn't wrong. He said that M&P would have a part to play - and they did. He also seems to have been thinking about the fact that they were essentially innocent - and it was that childlike innocence which got both hobbits into positions in the militaries of Rohan and Gondor.

The thing is (one of the many thing), in the books, the Fellowship is pretty much an ad-hoc group. Elrond explicitly tells them they don't have to go any further than they want (except Frodo), and in fact, Aragorn and Boromir planned to split off and go to Gondor. That went out of the window when Gandalf died, but it was the plan.

So have an elf who wants to go home to Lorien, and doesn't care for any of the Fellowship - but grows close to them during the journey, and stays with them. Or, well, there's loads of options.

In the movie, it's even easier. The idea of matching the number of Nazgul never even comes up - Elrond just takes anyone who volunteers.

Of course, that's (all) just about getting them on the team. I think you're right that an extra member means the Fellowship should split differently. Maybe s/he manages to save Boromir, allowing Aragorn and Boromir to go to Minas Tirith while Legolas, Gimli, and the OC to go after the hobbits. Maybe the hobbits never get captured - or maybe Merry gets killed by that injury to his forehead, due to the OC changing the state of the battle.

Or maybe the OC stays on the shoreline, helps Frodo to leave quicker, and they go off without Sam - or Frodo leaves alone. Or... yeah, loads of options.

But no, making a story which consists of 'And Magielf was there also' every three sentences isn't good writing. ;)

hS

Reply Return to messages